Unstable bicondylar tibial plateau fractures
are rare and there is little guidance in the literature as to the
best form of treatment. We examined the short- to medium-term outcome
of this injury in a consecutive series of patients presenting to
two trauma centres. Between December 2005 and May 2010, a total
of 55 fractures in 54 patients were treated by fixation, 34 with
peri-articular locking plates and 21 with limited access direct
internal fixation in combination with circular external fixation
using a Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF). At a minimum of one year post-operatively,
patient-reported outcome measures including the WOMAC index and
SF-36 scores showed functional deficits, although there was no significant
difference between the two forms of treatment. Despite low outcome scores,
patients were generally satisfied with the outcome. We achieved
good clinical and radiological outcomes, with low rates of complication.
In total, only three patients (5%) had collapse of the joint of
>
4 mm, and metaphysis to diaphysis angulation of greater than 5º,
and five patients (9%) with displacement of >
4 mm. All patients
in our study went on to achieve full union. This study highlights the serious nature of this injury and generally
poor patient-reported outcome measures following surgery, despite
treatment by experienced surgeons using modern surgical techniques.
Our findings suggest that treatment of complex bicondylar tibial
plateau fractures with either a locking plate or a TSF gives similar
clinical and radiological outcomes. Cite this article:
A total of 57 patients, aged between 23 and 86 years, with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1 nine weeks after an isolated closed fracture of the distal radius, was randomised to receive either serial intravenous regional blockade (IVRB) with 15 mg of guanethidine in 30 ml of 0.5% prilocaine or serial IVRB with 30 ml of normal saline at weekly intervals until the tenderness in their fingers had resolved or they had received a maximum of four IVRBs. The analgesic efficacy was assessed at 24 hours, 48 hours and one week after each procedure by the dolorimetry ratio and verbal pain scores, and at intervals up to six months after the fracture. There was no significant difference in the number of IVRBs administered or in finger tenderness, stiffness or grip strength between the two groups. The guanethidine group experienced more pain in the affected hand (p = 0.025) and at six months had more vasomotor instability (p <
0.0001) compared with the control group. IVRB using guanethidine offers no significant analgesic advantage over a normal saline placebo block in the treatment of early CRPS type 1 of the hand after fracture of the distal radius. It does not improve the outcome of this condition and may delay the resolution of vasomotor instability when compared with the placebo.
