Several radiological methods of measuring anteversion
of the acetabular component after total hip replacement (THR) have
been described. These studies used different definitions and reference
planes to compare methods, allowing for misinterpretation of the
results. We compared the reliability and accuracy of five current
methods using plain radiographs (those of Lewinnek, Widmer, Liaw,
Pradhan, and Woo and Morrey) with CT measurements, using the same
definition and reference plane. We retrospectively studied the plain
radiographs and CT scans in 84 hips of 84 patients who underwent
primary THR. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were high for
the measurement of inclination and anteversion with all methods
on plain radiographs and CT scans. The measurements of inclination on
plain radiographs were similar to the measurements using CT (p =
0.043). The mean difference between CT measurements was 0.6° (-5.9°
to 6.8°). Measurements using Widmer’s method were the most similar to those
using CT (p = 0.088), with a mean difference between CT measurements
of -0.9° (-10.4° to 9.1°), whereas the other four methods differed
significantly from those using CT (p <
0.001). This study has shown that Widmer’s method is the best for evaluating
the anteversion of the acetabular component on plain radiographs. Cite this article:
