In this study we evaluated whether pre-operative
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis
scores can predict satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty
(THA). Prospective data for a cohort of patients undergoing THA
from two large academic centres were collected, and pre-operative
and one-year post-operative WOMAC scores and a 25-point satisfaction
questionnaire were obtained for 446 patients. Satisfaction scores
were dichotomised into either improvement or deterioration. Scatter
plots and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient were used to describe
the association between pre-operative WOMAC and one-year post-operative WOMAC
scores and patient satisfaction. Satisfaction was compared using
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis against pre-operative,
post-operative and δ WOMAC scores. We found no relationship between pre-operative WOMAC scores and
one-year post-operative WOMAC or satisfaction scores, with Spearman’s
rank correlation coefficients of 0.16 and –0.05, respectively. The
ROC analysis showed areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.54 (pre-operative
WOMAC), 0.67 (post-operative WOMAC) and 0.43 (δ WOMAC), respectively,
for an improvement in satisfaction. We conclude that the pre-operative WOMAC score does not predict
the post-operative WOMAC score or patient satisfaction after THA,
and that WOMAC scores can therefore not be used to prioritise patient
care. Cite this article:
This study explores the relationship between
delay to surgical debridement and deep infection in a series of
364 consecutive patients with 459 open fractures treated at an academic
level one trauma hospital in North America. The mean delay to debridement for all fractures was 10.6 hours
(0.6 to 111.5). There were 46 deep infections (10%). There were
no infections among the 55 Gustilo-Anderson grade I open fractures.
Among the grade II and III injuries, a statistically significant
increase in the rate of deep infection was found for each hour of
delay (OR = 1.033: 95% CI 1.01 to 1.057). This relationship shows
a linear increase of 3% per hour of delay. No distinct time cut-off
points were identified. Deep infection was also associated with
tibial fractures (OR = 2.44: 95% CI 1.26 to 4.73), a higher Gustilo-Anderson
grade (OR = 1.99: 95% CI 1.004 to 3.954), and contamination of the
fracture (OR = 3.12: 95% CI 1.36 to 7.36). These individual effects
are additive, which suggests that delayed debridement will have
a clinically significant detrimental effect on more severe open
fractures. Delayed treatment appeared safe for grade 1 open fractures. However,
when the negative prognostic factors of tibial site, high grade
of fracture and/or contamination are present we recommend more urgent
operative debridement. Cite this article:
We have evaluated the functional, clinical and radiological outcome of patients with simple and complex acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall, and identified factors associated with an adverse outcome. We reviewed 128 patients treated operatively for a fracture involving the posterior wall of the acetabulum between 1982 and 1999. The Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment and Short-Form 36 scores, the presence of radiological arthritis and complications were assessed as a function of injury, treatment and clinical variables. The patients had profound functional deficits compared with the normal population. Anatomical reduction alone was not sufficient to restore function. The fracture pattern, marginal impaction and residual displacement of >
2 mm were associated with the development of arthritis, which related to poor function and the need for hip replacement. It may be appropriate to consider immediate total hip replacement for patients aged >
50 years with marginal impaction and comminution of the wall, since 7 of 13 (54%) of these required early hip replacement.
A total of 179 adult patients with displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius was randomised to receive indirect percutaneous reduction and external fixation (n = 88) or open reduction and internal fixation (n = 91). Patients were followed up for two years. During the first year the upper limb musculoskeletal function assessment score, the SF-36 bodily pain sub-scale score, the overall Jebsen score, pinch strength and grip strength improved significantly in all patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the radiological restoration of anatomical features or the range of movement between the groups. During the period of two years, patients who underwent indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation had a more rapid return of function and a better functional outcome than those who underwent open reduction and internal fixation, provided that the intra-articular step and gap deformity were minimised.
Death during the first year after hip fracture may be influenced by the type of hospital in which patients are treated as well as the time spent awaiting surgery. We studied 57 315 hip fracture patients who were admitted to hospital in Ontario, Canada. Patients treated in teaching hospitals had a decreased risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 0.97) compared with those treated in urban community institutions. There was a trend toward increased mortality in rural rather than urban community hospitals. In-hospital mortality increased as the surgical delay increased (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.16) for a one-day delay and higher (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.42 to 1.80) for delays of more than two days. This relationship was strongest for patients younger than 70 years of age and with no comorbidities but was independent of hospital status. Similar relationships were seen at three months and one year after surgery. This suggests that any delay to surgery for non-medical reasons is detrimental to a patient’s outcome.
The reliability of the radiological assessment of the healing of tibial fractures remains undetermined. We examined the inter- and intraobserver agreement of the healing of such fractures among four orthopaedic trauma surgeons who, on two separate occasions eight weeks apart, independently assessed the radiographs of 30 patients with fractures of the tibial shaft which had been treated by intramedullary fixation. The radiographs were selected from a database to represent fractures at various stages of healing. For each radiograph, the surgeon scored the degree of union, quantified the number of cortices bridged by callus or with a visible fracture line, described the extent and quality of the callus, and provided an overall rating of healing. The interobserver chance-corrected agreement using a quadratically weighted kappa (κ) statistic in which values of 0.61 to 0.80 represented substantial agreement were as follows: radiological union scale (κ = 0.60); number of cortices bridged by callus (κ = 0.75); number of cortices with a visible fracture line (κ = 0.70); the extent of the callus (κ = 0.57); and general impression of fracture healing (κ = 0.67). The intraobserver agreement of the overall impression of healing (κ = 0.89) and the number of cortices bridged by callus (κ = 0.82) or with a visible fracture line (κ = 0.83) was almost perfect. There are no validated scales which allow surgeons to grade fracture healing radiologically. Among those examined, the number of cortices bridged by bone appears to be a reliable, and easily measured radiological variable to assess the healing of fractures after intramedullary fixation.
We reviewed 26 patients who had had internal fixation of an open intra-articular supracondylar fracture of the humerus. All operations were performed using a posterior approach, 13 with a triceps split and 13 with an olecranon osteotomy. The outcome was assessed by means of the Mayo Elbow score, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the SF-36 Physical Function score. Patients with an olecranon osteotomy had less good results.
We sought to quantify agreement by different assessors of the AO classification for distal fractures of the radius. Thirty radiographs of acute distal radial fractures were evaluated by 36 assessors of varying clinical experience. Our findings suggest that AO ‘type’ and the presence or absence of articular displacement are measured with high consistency when classification of distal radial fractures is undertaken by experienced observers. Assessors at all experience levels had difficulty agreeing on AO ‘group’ and especially AO ‘subgroup’. To categorise distal radial fractures according to joint displacement and AO type is simple and reproducible. Our study examined only whether distal radial fractures could be consistently classified according to the AO system. Validation of the classification as a predictor of outcome will require a prospective clinical study.
