Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
The Bone & Joint Journal

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1296 - 1299
1 Oct 2011
Lang JE Mannava S Floyd AJ Goddard MS Smith BP Mofidi A M. Seyler T Jinnah RH

Robots have been used in surgery since the late 1980s. Orthopaedic surgery began to incorporate robotic technology in 1992, with the introduction of ROBODOC, for the planning and performance of total hip replacement. The use of robotic systems has subsequently increased, with promising short-term radiological outcomes when compared with traditional orthopaedic procedures. Robotic systems can be classified into two categories: autonomous and haptic (or surgeon-guided). Passive surgery systems, which represent a third type of technology, have also been adopted recently by orthopaedic surgeons.

While autonomous systems have fallen out of favour, tactile systems with technological improvements have become widely used. Specifically, the use of tactile and passive robotic systems in unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has addressed some of the historical mechanisms of failure of non-robotic UKR. These systems assist with increasing the accuracy of the alignment of the components and produce more consistent ligament balance. Short-term improvements in clinical and radiological outcomes have increased the popularity of robot-assisted UKR.

Robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery has the potential for improving surgical outcomes. We discuss the different types of robotic systems available for use in orthopaedics and consider the indication, contraindications and limitations of these technologies.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 1 | Pages 124 - 129
1 Jan 2001
Lofthouse RA Davis JR Frondoza CG Jinnah RH Hungerford DS Hare JM

Caveolae, specialised regions of the cell membrane which have been detected in a wide range of mammalian cells, have not been described in bone cells. They are plasmalemmal invaginations, 50 to 100 nm in size, characterised by the presence of the structural protein, caveolin, which exists as three subtypes. Caveolin-1 and caveolin-2 are expressed in a wide range of cell types whereas caveolin-3 is thought to be a muscle-specific subtype. There is little information on the precise function of caveolae, but it has been proposed that they play an important role in signal transduction.

As the principal bone-producing cell, the osteoblast has been widely studied in an effort to understand the signalling pathways by which it responds to extracellular stimuli. Our aim in this study was to identify caveolae and their structural protein caveolin in normal human osteoblasts, and to determine which subtypes of caveolin were present. Confocal microscopy showed staining which was associated with the plasma membrane. Transmission electron microscopy revealed the presence of membrane invaginations of 50 to 100 nm, consistent with the appearance of caveolae. Finally, we isolated protein from these osteoblasts, and performed Western blotting using anti-caveolin primary antibodies. This revealed the presence of caveolin-1 and -2, while caveolin-3 was absent.

The identification of these structures and their associated protein may provide a significant contribution to our further understanding of signal transduction pathways in osteoblasts.