Open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) for medial-compartment
osteoarthritis of the knee can be complicated by intra-operative
lateral hinge fracture (LHF). We aimed to establish the relationship
between hinge position and fracture types, and suggest an appropriate
hinge position to reduce the risk of this complication. Consecutive patients undergoing OWHTO were evaluated on coronal
multiplanar reconstruction CT images. Hinge positions were divided
into five zones in our new classification, by their relationship
to the proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ). Fractures were classified
into types I, II, and III according to the Takeuchi classification.Aims
Patients and Methods
The objective of this study was to validate the
efficacy of Takeuchi classification for lateral hinge fractures
(LHFs) in open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). In all 74 osteoarthritic
knees (58 females, 16 males; mean age 62.9 years, standard deviation
7.5, 42 to 77) were treated with OWHTO using a TomoFix plate. The
knees were divided into non-fracture (59 knees) and LHF (15 knees)
groups, and the LHF group was further divided into Takeuchi types
I, II, and III (seven, two, and six knees, respectively). The outcomes
were assessed pre-operatively and one year after OWHTO. Pre-operative
characteristics (age, gender and body mass index) showed no significant
difference between the two groups. The mean Japanese Orthopaedic
Association score was significantly improved one year after operation
regardless of the presence or absence of LHF (p = 0.0015, p <
0.001, respectively). However, six of seven type I cases had no
LHF-related complications; both type II cases had delayed union;
and of six type III cases, two had delayed union with correction
loss and one had overcorrection. These results suggest that Takeuchi
type II and III LHFs are structurally unstable compared with type
I. Cite this article:
It has recently been reported that the transverse
acetabular ligament (TAL) is helpful in determining the position
of the acetabular component in total hip replacement (THR). In this
study we used a computer-assisted navigation system to determine
whether the TAL is useful as a landmark in THR. The study was carried
out in 121 consecutive patients undergoing primary THR (134 hips),
including 67 dysplastic hips (50%). There were 26 men (29 hips)
and 95 women (105 hips) with a mean age of 60.2 years (17 to 82)
at the time of operation. After identification of the TAL, its anteversion
was measured intra-operatively by aligning the inferomedial rim
of the trial acetabular component with the TAL using computer-assisted
navigation. The TAL was identified in 112 hips (83.6%). Intra-observer reproducibility
in the measurement of anteversion of the TAL was high, but inter-observer
reproducibility was moderate. Each surgeon was able to align the trial component according
to the target value of the angle of anteversion of the TAL, but
it was clear that methods may differ among surgeons. Of the measurements
of the angle of anteversion of the TAL, 5.4% (6 of 112 hips) were
outliers from the safe zone. In summary, we found that the TAL is useful as a landmark when
implanting the acetabular component within the safe zone in almost
all hips, and to prevent it being implanted in retroversion in all
hips, including dysplastic hips. However, as anteversion of the
TAL may be excessive in a few hips, it is advisable to pay attention
to individual variations, particularly in those with severe posterior
pelvic tilt. Cite this article:
