The aim of this study was to investigate whether on-demand removal (ODR) is noninferior to routine removal (RR) of syndesmotic screws regarding functional outcome. Adult patients (aged above 17 years) with traumatic syndesmotic injury, surgically treated within 14 days of trauma using one or two syndesmotic screws, were eligible (n = 490) for inclusion in this randomized controlled noninferiority trial. A total of 197 patients were randomized for either ODR (retaining the syndesmotic screw unless there were complaints warranting removal) or RR (screw removed at eight to 12 weeks after syndesmotic fixation), of whom 152 completed the study. The primary outcome was functional outcome at 12 months after screw placement, measured by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS).Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome in patients undergoing implant removal (IR) after fracture fixation below the level of the knee. All adult patients (18 to 75 years) undergoing IR after fracture fixation below the level of the knee between November 2014 and September 2016 were included as part of the WIFI (Wound Infections Following Implant Removal Below the Knee) trial, performed in 17 teaching hospitals and two university hospitals in The Netherlands. In this multicentre prospective cohort, the primary outcome was the difference in functional status before and after IR, measured by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), with a minimal clinically important difference of nine points.Aims
Patients and Methods
In approximately 20% of patients with ankle fractures, there
is an concomitant injury to the syndesmosis which requires stabilisation,
usually with one or more syndesmotic screws. The aim of this review
is to evaluate whether removal of the syndesmotic screw is required
in order for the patient to obtain optimal functional recovery. A literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase and the
Cochrane Library for articles in which the syndesmotic screw was
retained. Articles describing both removal and retaining of syndesmotic
screws were included. Excluded were biomechanical studies, studies
not providing patient related outcome measures, case reports, studies
on skeletally immature patients and reviews. No restrictions regarding
year of publication and language were applied.Aims
Materials and Methods
