After intercalary resection of a bone tumour from the femur,
reconstruction with a vascularized fibular graft (VFG) and massive
allograft is considered a reliable method of treatment. However,
little is known about the long-term outcome of this procedure. The
aims of this study were to determine whether the morbidity of this
procedure was comparable to that of other reconstructive techniques,
if it was possible to achieve a satisfactory functional result, and
whether biological reconstruction with a VFG and massive allograft
could achieve a durable, long-lasting reconstruction. A total of 23 patients with a mean age of 16 years (five to 40)
who had undergone resection of an intercalary bone tumour of the
femur and reconstruction with a VFG and allograft were reviewed
clinically and radiologically. The mean follow-up was 141 months
(24 to 313). The mean length of the fibular graft was 18 cm (12 to
29). Full weight-bearing without a brace was allowed after a mean
of 13 months (seven to 26).Aims
Patients and Methods
Several techniques have been described to reconstruct a mobile wrist joint after resection of the distal radius for tumour. We reviewed our experience of using an osteo-articular allograft to do this in 17 patients with a mean follow-up of 58.9 months (28 to 119). The mean range of movement at the wrist was 56° flexion, 58° extension, 84° supination and 80° pronation. The mean ISOLS-MSTS score was 86% (63% to 97%) and the mean patient-rated wrist evaluation score was 16.5 (3 to 34). There was no local recurrence or distant metastases. The procedure failed in one patient with a fracture of the graft and an arthrodesis was finally required. Union was achieved at the host-graft interface in all except two cases. No patient reported more than modest non-disabling pain and six reported no pain at all. Radiographs showed early degenerative changes at the radiocarpal joint in every patient. A functional pain-free wrist can be restored with an osteo-articular allograft after resection of the distal radius for bone tumour, thereby avoiding the donor site morbidity associated with an autograft. These results may deteriorate with time.
We reviewed 25 patients who had undergone resection of a primary bone sarcoma which extended to within 5 cm of the knee with reconstruction by a combination of a free vascularised fibular graft and a massive allograft bone shell. The distal femur was affected in four patients and the proximal tibia in 21. Their mean age at the time of operation was 19.7 years (5 to 52) and the mean follow-up period 140 months (28 to 213). Three vascularised transfers failed. The mean time to union of the fibula was 5.6 months (3 to 10) and of the allograft 19.6 months (10 to 34). Full weight-bearing was allowed at a mean of 21.4 months (14 to 36). The mean functional score at final follow-up was 27.4 (18 to 30) using a modfied 30-point Musculoskeletal Tumour Society rating system. The overall limb-salvage rate was 88%. The results of our study suggest that the combined use of a vascularised fibular graft and allograft is of value as a limb-salvage procedure for intercalary reconstruction after resection of bone tumours around the knee, especially in skeletally immature patients.
