Routine surveillance of primary hip and knee arthroplasties has traditionally been performed with office follow-up visits at one year postoperatively. The value of these visits is unclear. The present study aims to determine the utility and burden of routine clinical follow-up at one year after primary arthroplasty to patients and providers. All patients (473) who underwent primary total hip (280), hip resurfacing (eight), total knee (179), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (six) over a nine-month period at a single institution were identified from an institutional registry. Patients were prompted to attend their routine one-year postoperative visit by a single telephone reminder. Patients and surgeons were given questionnaires at the one-year postoperative visit, defined as a clinical encounter occurring at nine to 15 months from the date of surgery, regarding value of the visit.Aims
Methods
Haematomas, drainage, and other non-infectious
wound complications following total knee replacement (TKR) have
been associated with long-term sequelae, in particular, deep infection.
However, the impact of these wound complications on clinical outcome
is unknown. This study compares results in 15 patients re-admitted
for wound complications within 90 days of TKR to 30 matched patients
who underwent uncomplicated total knee replacements. Patients with
wound complications had a mean age of 66 years (49 to 83) and mean
body mass index (BMI) of 37 (21 to 54), both similar to that of
patients without complications (mean age 65 years and mean BMI 35). Those
with complications had lower mean Knee Society function scores (46
(0 to 100 Cite this article:
