Instability of the hip is the most common mode of failure after
reconstruction with a proximal femoral arthroplasty (PFA) using
an endoprosthesis after excision of a tumour. Small studies report
improved stability with capsular repair of the hip and other techniques,
but these have not been investigated in a large series of patients.
The aim of this study was to evaluate variables associated with
the patient and the operation that affect post-operative stability.
We hypothesised an association between capsular repair and stability. In a retrospective cohort study, we identified 527 adult patients
who were treated with a PFA for tumours. Our data included demographics,
the pathological diagnosis, the amount of resection of the abductor
muscles, the techniques of reconstruction and the characteristics
of the implant. We used regression analysis to compare patients
with and without post-operative instability.Aims
Patients and Methods
Previous classification systems of failure of
limb salvage focused primarily on endoprosthetic failures and lacked sufficient
depth for the effective study of the causes of failure. In order
to address these inadequacies, the International Society of Limb
Salvage (ISOLS) formed a committee to recommend revisions of the
previous systems. The purpose of this study was to report on their
recommendations. The modifications were prepared using an earlier,
evidence-based model with subclassification based on the existing
medical literature. Subclassification for all five primary types
of failure of limb salvage following endoprosthetic reconstruction
were formulated and a complementary system was derived for the failure
of biological reconstruction. An additional classification of failure
in paediatric patients was also described. Limb salvage surgery presents a complex array of potential mechanisms
of failure, and a complete and precise classification of types of
failure is required. Earlier classification systems lacked specificity,
and the evidence-based system outlined here is designed to correct
these weaknesses and to provide a means of reporting failures of
limb salvage in order to allow the interpretation of outcome following
reconstructive surgery. Cite this article:
The outcome of tibial allograft reconstruction after resection of a tumour is inconsistent and has a high rate of failure. There are few reports on the use of tibial allografts in children with open growth plates. We performed 21 allograft reconstructions (16 osteoarticular, five intercalary) in 19 consecutive patients between seven and 17 years of age. Two had Ewing’s sarcoma, one an adamantinoma and 16 osteosarcoma, one with multifocal disease. Five patients have died; the other 14 were free from disease at the time of follow-up. Six surviving patients (eight allograft reconstructions) continue to have good or excellent function at a mean of 59 months (14 to 132). One patient has poor function at 31 months. The other seven patients have a good or excellent function after additional procedures including exchange of the allograft and resurfacing or revision to an endoprosthesis at a mean of 101 months (43 to 198). The additional operations were performed at a mean of 47 months (20 to 84) after the first reconstruction. With the use of allograft reconstruction in growing children, joints and growth plates may be preserved, at least partially. Although our results remain inconsistent, tibial allograft reconstruction in selected patients may restore complete and durable function of the limb.
