Aims. In orthopaedic and trauma surgery, implant-associated infections are increasingly treated with local application of antibiotics, which allows a high local drug concentration to be reached without eliciting systematic adverse effects. While ceftriaxone is a widely used antibiotic agent that has been shown to be effective against musculoskeletal infections, high local concentrations may harm the surrounding tissue. This study investigates the acute and subacute cytotoxicity of increasing ceftriaxone concentrations as well as their influence on the osteogenic differentiation of human bone progenitor cells. Methods. Human preosteoblasts were cultured in presence of different concentrations of ceftriaxone for up to 28 days and potential cytotoxic effects, cell death, metabolic activity, cell proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation were studied. Results. Ceftriaxone showed a cytotoxic effect on human bone progenitor cells at 24 h and 48 h at concentrations above 15,000 mg/l. With a longer incubation time of ten days, subtoxic effects could be observed at concentrations above 500 mg/l. Gene and protein expression of collagen, as well as mineralization levels of human bone progenitor cells, showed a continuous decrease with increasing ceftriaxone concentrations by days 14 and 28, respectively. Notably, mineralization was negatively affected already at concentrations above 250 mg/l. Conclusion. This study demonstrates a concentration-dependent influence of ceftriaxone on the viability and mineralization potential of primary human bone progenitor cells. While local application of ceftriaxone is highly established in orthopaedic and trauma surgery, a therapeutic threshold of 250 mg/l or lower should diminish the risk of reduced osseointegration of prosthetic implants. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(3):218–225

Implant-related infection is one of the leading reasons for failure in orthopaedics and trauma, and results in high social and economic costs. Various antibacterial coating technologies have proven to be safe and effective both in preclinical and clinical studies, with post-surgical implant-related infections reduced by 90% in some cases, depending on the type of coating and experimental setup used. Economic assessment may enable the cost-to-benefit profile of any given antibacterial coating to be defined, based on the expected infection rate with and without the coating, the cost of the infection management, and the cost of the coating. After reviewing the latest evidence on the available antibacterial coatings, we quantified the impact caused by delaying their large-scale application. Considering only joint arthroplasties, our calculations indicated that for an antibacterial coating, with a final user’s cost price of €600 and able to reduce post-surgical infection by 80%, each year of delay to its large-scale application would cause an estimated 35 200 new cases of post-surgical infection in Europe, equating to additional hospital costs of approximately €440 million per year. An adequate reimbursement policy for antibacterial coatings may benefit patients, healthcare systems, and related research, as could faster and more affordable regulatory pathways for the technologies still in the pipeline. This could significantly reduce the social and economic burden of implant-related infections in orthopaedics and trauma.

Cite this article: C. L. Romanò, H. Tsuchiya, I. Morelli, A. G. Battaglia, L. Drago. Antibacterial coating of implants: are we missing something? Bone Joint Res 2019;8:199–206. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.85.BJR-2018-0316.