To establish cut-off values for lateral pubofemoral distance (PFD) measurements for detecting hip dysplasia in early (four days) and standard care (six weeks) screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). All newborns, during a one-year period (October 2021 to October 2022), were offered a PFD ultrasound (US) examination in addition to the existing screening programme for DDH. Newborns who were referred for standard care hip US, suspected for DDH, received a secondary PFD US examination in conjunction with the standard care Graf/Harcke hip US examination. Receiver operating characteristic curves and empirically optimal cut-off values were calculated with a true positive defined as a Graf type ≥ IIc hip.Aims
Methods
The present study seeks to investigate the correlation of pubofemoral distances (PFD) to α angles, and hip displaceability status, defined as femoral head coverage (FHC) or FHC during manual provocation of the newborn hip < 50%. We retrospectively included all newborns referred for ultrasound screening at our institution based on primary risk factor, clinical, and PFD screening. α angles, PFD, FHC, and FHC at follow-up ultrasound for referred newborns were measured and compared using scatter plots, linear regression, paired Aims
Methods
Lengthening osteotomies of the calcaneus in children are in general
grafted with bone from the iliac crest. Artificial bone grafts have
been introduced, however, their structural and clinical durability
has not been documented. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is a very
accurate and precise method for measurements of rigid body movements including
the evaluation of joint implant and fracture stability, however,
RSA has not previously been used in clinical studies of calcaneal
osteotomies. We assessed the precision of RSA as a measurement tool
in a lateral calcaneal lengthening osteotomy (LCLO). LCLO was performed in six fixed adult cadaver feet. Tantalum
markers were inserted on each side of the osteotomy and in the cuboideum.
Lengthening was done with a plexiglas wedge. A total of 24 radiological
double examinations were obtained. Two feet were excluded due to
loose and poorly dispersed markers. Precision was assessed as systematic
bias and 95% repeatability limits.Objectives
Methods
