Daytime spinal loading is twice as long as night time rest, but diurnal disc height changes due to fluid flow are balanced. A direction-dependent permeability of the endplates, favouring inflow over outflow, has been proposed to explain this; however, fluid also flows through the annulus fibrosus. This study investigates the poro-elastic behaviour of entire intervertebral discs in the context of diurnal fluid flow.

Caprine discs were preloaded in saline for 24 hours under different levels of static load. Under sustained load, we modulated the disc's swelling pressure by replacing saline for demi-water and back again to saline, both for 24h intervals. We measured the disc height creep and used stretched exponential models to determine the respective time constants.

Reduction of culture medium osmolality induced an increase in disc height, and the subsequent restoration induced a decrease in disc height. Creep varied with the mechanical load applied. No direction-dependent resistance to fluid flow was observed. In addition, time constants for mechanical preloading were much shorter than for osmotic loading, suggesting that outflow is faster than inflow. However, a time constant does not describe the actual rate of fluid flow: close to equilibrium fluid flow is slower than far from equilibrium. As time constants for mechanical loading are shorter and daytime loading twice as long, the system is closer to the loading equilibrium than to the unloading equilibrium. Therefore, paradoxically, fluid inflow is faster during the night than fluid outflow during the day.

We present the rationale and design of the DynaPort KneeTest. The test aims at measuring knee patients’ functional abilities in an unobtrusive, user-friendly way. Test persons wear several belts around their trunk and legs. The belts contain accelerometers, the signals of which are stored in a recorder, embedded in one of the belts. The knee test consists of a set of 29 tasks related to activities of daily life (“test items”). Accelerometer signals are analysed in terms of 30 “movement features” (accelerations, angles, durations, frequencies, and some dimensionless numbers). In data analysis, the beginning and end of each test item is marked by hand; otherwise, analysis is automatic.

We compared 140 knee patients with 32 healthy controls and found 541 of the 29 x 30 =870 test item movement feature combinations differed significantly between the two groups. From these 541 combinations the DynaPort knee score is calculated by the weighted averages of movement features per item, then weighted averages of items per cluster (locomotion, rising and descending, transfers, lifting and moving objects), and finally the average of the clusters. In an initial study the test-retest reliability of the knee test proved high, and the test turned out to be sufficiently responsive (0.7 patients’ standard deviations improvement after 24 months). However, it remains difficult to interpret the scores in more meaningful terms than merely “better” or “worse”. Extensive reliability studies in the future will further assess the validity of the test and provide more insight into the meaning of the scores.

The DynaPort knee test may thus become an important instrument for evaluating patients’ functional abilities in knee-related clinical practice and research.