First-time anterior dislocation of the shoulder is associated with the development of recurrent instability. It is recognised that patients with recurrent instability often have osseous defects. Using 3D computerised tomography (3DCT) it is possible to quantify these defects. Whether these defects are present after the primary dislocation or occur progressively from multiple dislocations is unclear. We correlated the presence of Hill-Sachs lesions and anterior glenoid bone loss with evidence of recurrent dislocation and clinical outcomes.

78 patients were followed up for two years. All underwent a 3DCT within a week of injury. Standardised images of the humeral head and glenoid were produced. Using standardised digital techniques bone loss was measured.

39% of the patients developed further instability. Average Hill-Sachs circumferential length = 15.23%. Average Hill-Sachs surface area = 5.53%. The length and surface area of the Hill-Sachs lesions were significantly associated with further instability. (p=0.019 and p=0.003). Average en face glenoid surface area loss=1.30% with no association to instability (p=0.685). There was poor correlation between the size of the glenoid lesion and the size of the Hill-Sachs lesion.

Results showed that age and increasing size of the Hill-Sachs lesions result in a higher rate of instability. Interestingly glenoid bone loss was relatively low and did not predict recurrent instability. The size of the Hill-Sachs lesion does not have a linear relationship with glenoid bone loss. Further work defining the morphology of the Hill-Sachs lesion and its engagement with a glenoid defect is required.

A Morton's neuroma is a painful forefoot disorder characterised by plantar pain and toe paraesthesia. Many treatments have been tried including modification of shoe wear, injections and surgery. The results from different treatment modalities are extremely variable in the scientific literature.

We reviewed 79 patients who presented with an ultrasound proven Morton's Neuromata at an average of 60 months following treatment in a patient blind randomised trial.

35 had surgery with resection of the Morton's Neuromata. We compared the results of the patients who had had a steroid injection and surgery, a steroid injection alone, a placebo injection and then surgery and a placebo injection alone.

We looked at the requirement for further consultations, pain scores, activity restrictions, footwear restriction, overall satisfaction with their treatment and overall quality of life scores. We found no significant difference between the groups. Overall 80% of the surgical patients had a good or excellent result and 67% of the non- operatively managed patients had a good or excellent result. There was no difference in their quality of life scores.

Previous studies have shown little benefit in steroid injections in the treatment of Morton's Neuromata. We conclude at the five year mark there is no significant differences between operating on Morton's Neuromata and treating them conservatively.

Further research should focus on comparing operative vs conservative treatment in the short to medium term. In order to justify the risks and costs of surgery.

Aim: To investigate factors that influence outcomes one year after distal radial fractures To investigate how deformity (radiologically), functional outcome and patient satisfaction affect one another.

Background: Identifying the factors that influence outcome in DRF is important in anticipating and treating patients with potentially correctable factors that may affect recovery. Previous studies have looked at different sub-sets of the DRF group most often with patient reported outcomes. We have reviewed a large consecutive group of DRF looking at which factors influenced the outcomes.

Methods: Data on 640 distal radial fractures was prospectively recorded over a 24 month period. The database was reviewed and validated. Mechanism of injury, hand dominance and occupation were noted. Initial, post reduction, one week, 6 week and one year x-rays were taken. The volar and dorsal shortening, tilt and angulation were recorded. Any operative intervention or complication was noted.

At one year follow up functional testing was performed including range of movement. This tested for grip strength, multiple postional strengths and a functional score looking at activities of daily living.

Results: Prediction of functional outcome was significantly associated with age, volar communition, dorsal angulation and pain. The grip strength after a distal radial fracture is significantly stronger in dominant side fractures compared with non dominant, in younger patients and those without dorsal communition.

We also showed that fractures that are most likely to malunite show a significantly poorer functional outcome and weaker grip strength.

Conclusion: This study identifies factors that predict the functional outcome in Distal Radial fractures. Although many assumptions are made that certain fractures lead to poorer results this has rarely been shown in such a large, diverse group of DRFs.

In an age where patients and practitioners strive to ever increasing levels of knowledge this study allows us to counsel patients in their likely functional outcomes more accurately.

Despite increasing scientific investigation, the best method for preventing post-operative deep vein thrombosis remains unclear in patients undergoing a total hip replacement. In the wake of the recent controversial National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Clinical Guidelines on the prevention of thrombo-embolism, we felt it was timely to survey current Scottish Surgeons thrombo-prophylactic practice when performing total hip replacements.

E-mail questionnaires were sent to all Scottish Orthopaedic consultants. They were asked about routine pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Comparison was made with a previous survey done in 2003.

The response rate was 75%. The survey showed an increased use of pharmacological prophylaxis from 93% to 100%. This was due to the increased use of aspirin, from 51% to 64%. The use of Low molecular weight heparin had remained the same at 51%. No surgeons routinely use Warfarin, low dose heparin or Fondaparinux. Use of graded compression stockings has increased from 59% to 70%.

There is increasing evidence that patients undergoing total hip replacement should receive extended prophylaxis for up to 35 days. This could explain why aspirin is commonly used. Most guidelines, however, do not recommend this drug. With the recent launch of two new oral agents we may see a huge change in prophylaxis in Scotland, as 94% of surgeons said they would use extended prophylaxis if a safe oral agent was found.

Background: Several recent studies have compared incorporation of autograft with that of allograft or synthetic bone substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). These studies have almost universally relied on plain radiography to assess bone incorporation despite the fact that we know, from similar lumbar spine studies, that bone ingrowth is over-estimated.

Our aim was to determine the exactly whether bone incorporation may be correctly assessed by this method by comparing the results to those obtained by spiral CT imaging.

Methods: 15 patients underwent ACDF. Helical CT scans were obtained. Fusion was defined as trabecular continuity across the disc space anterior, through and posterior to the cage proximally and distally and assessed by two of the authors independently.

Results: 14 of the 15 patients appeared to have solid incorporation of bone graft/substitute on plain radiography, 19 out of 20 cages. These findings were not however replicated on CT imaging. The autograft was not considered to have been incorporated proximally above the cage in 5 cases and distally in 6 cases.

Discussion: The implication of our results is that there is at least a false positive rate of bone incorporation of 20–25%. Pseudarthroses are generally painful and therefore we would recommend that spiral CT imaging is performed in patients who have ongoing pain following ACDF.

Ethics approval: COREC Ethics committee number 06/S1104/34

Interest Statement: None of the authors have received any grants to carry out this research.

Aim: To study the effect of smoking on the rate of complications and functional outcome after Total Hip Replacement (THR).

Methods: Data was prospectively collected for all patients undergoing a unilateral, primary THR in one hospital during the period 1998 to 2006 Data was collected at pre-operative assessment, in the peri-operative period and at 6 months, 18 months, 3 years and 5 years. Patients were placed in one of three groups; smokers, ex-smokers and those who had never smoked.

Outcome measures included rate of complications: infection, DVT, PE, length of hospital stay and Harris Hip Score (HHS).

Statistical analysis was undertaken to determine any correlation between smoking and these outcome measures using chi-squared tests, t-tests and multiple regression adjusting for confounding factors.

Results: 1765 patients underwent THR during the study period, of whom 635 were males and 1130 females, with a mean age at operation of 69.

268 patients (15%) were smokers, 582 patients (33%) were ex-smokers and 917 patients (52%) had never smoked. As there was little data available on when the ex-smokers had stopped smoking we studied current smokers compared to patients that had never smoked

There were no significant differences in complications such as DVT, PE, Deep infection and Superficial infection, these were all rare events. Neither was there any significant difference in hospital stay times. After adjusting for pre-operative HHS, age, sex and ASA status current smokers had significantly lower HHS at 6 months (p< 0.001, 95% confidence interval for effect size 1.6 to 5.3), and also showed a lower HHS at 18 months, 3 years and 5 years although not significantly so.

Conclusion: Current smokers have a significantly lower HHS post-operatively in comparison to non-smokers. In a health system where more and more patients wish to know the risk associated with potential operative interventions, we can now say that patients who smoke will have a poorer outcome post Total Hip Replacement. This may also allow us to discourage some patients wishing to have THR whom are poor operative candidates.

We plan to further analysis the data to try and ascertain why this is the case.