4 years of follow-up study on 27 patients who had biological reverse total shoulder replacement 12 patients who had Bio-RSA by using Tonier Aequalis reversed implants with bone graft extracted from the head of humerus before humeral shaft was prepared. The average age of this group of patients is 77. The average pre-operative shoulder abduction on the affected side is 52 degrees and forward flexion of 90 degrees. Indication for surgery in all those cases are due to cuff tear. The average post-operative abduction is 90 degrees and forward flexion of 97 degrees. The average follow-up period is 9 months with a range from 4 to 18 months. Two patients from this group failed to make an improvement in the range of their shoulder movements post-operatively.

15 underwent Bio-RSA by using Delta XTEND reverse shoulder system without bone graft. The average age of this group of patients is 73. The average pre-operative shoulder abduction is 35 degrees and forward flexion of 37 degrees. Indication for surgery again in most of the cases is due to cuff tear, except one case was due to proximal humeral fracture. The average post-operative abduction is 96 degrees and forward flexion of 101 degrees. The average follow-up period is 19 months with a range of 4–42 months. Only one patient failed to make an improvement post-operatively. This is the patient who had Bio-RSA due to a proximal humeral fracture. 6 patients out of this group also had previous resurfacing which has failed in comparison to the bone graft group which none had previous resurfacing surgery.

Whilst the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is becoming more common for the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy, there is still relatively little evidence with regards to its use in complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. It is increasingly felt to be of use in those patients in whom either internal fixation is not possible due to fracture configuration or bone quality, or in whom there is a rotator cuff deficiency.

We report the outcomes of 14 patients with complex 3- or 4-part humeral fractures or delayed presentation of dislocation treated with reverse TSR. Patients were treated within a two year period from January 2011 to December 2013. The average age at time of operation was 75 (50–91 years) with a mean follow-up of 7 months (2–13 months). One patient moved out of area and one lost to follow-up two months following procedure.

Reverse TSR was considered a salvage procedure for patients with comminuted proximal humeral fractures or those who presented with irreducible non-acute dislocations. At time of last follow-up all 14 patients were satisfied with the results of their operation and functionally independent with activities of daily living. Range of movement post-operatively was good with mean active forward extension 97° (70–150°) and abduction 101° (80–170°). 43% of patients were pain-free, whilst the remainder only required the use of occasional analgesia. No major post-operative complications were reported.

Patients who underwent reverse TSR for dislocation fared better than for those with proximal humeral fractures. The mean active forward extension was 107.5° (90–150°) and abduction 112.5° (90–170°) in the dislocation group (n=5) compared with those who had a fracture in which the forward extension was 91.4° (70–120°) and abduction 95° (80–120°).

The results of these patients demonstrate that reverse TSR should be considered in patients with complex proximal humeral fractures or delayed presentation of fractures. It seems to provide consistently excellent pain-relief for patients, with patients either reporting being pain-free or requiring only occasional analgesia. In addition, all patients treated were functionally independent following operation. Range of movement, particularly for those with dislocation, appear good. Further follow-up is required to ensure sustained results but early studies are encouraging.

Summary

There is little knowledge in surgeons about the guidelines for prophylactic antibiotics in patients with prosthetic joints when undergoing a dental procedure. This study confirms this and there is need for robust and universal guidelines given the disastrous nature of prosthetic infection.

Introduction:

Infection as an indication for revision has increased to 12% of the total revisions (UK NJR 9^th report). However, it is next to impossible to find out the cause for a delayed prosthetic infection. With increasing number of arthroplasty procedures, is there a need for prophylactic antibiotics in patients with prostheses?

Introduction:

The awareness of MoM hips in the general public, one would expect, to be good, given the media coverage. This study aims to look at the perceptions and knowledge of patients who have already got a MoM arthroplasty.