After total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a PCL-retaining implant the location of the tibiofemoral contact point should be restored in order to obtain normal kinematics. The difficulty during surgery is to control this location since the position of the femur on the tibia cannot easily be measured from the back of the joint. Therefore, we developed a simple “spacer technique” to check the contact point indirectly in 90° flexion after all bone cuts are made by measuring the step-off between the distal cut of the femur and the anterior edge of the tibia with a spacer in place. The goal of this experiment was to investigate whether this new PCL balancing approach with the spacer technique created the correct contact point location. Nine fresh-frozen full leg cadaver specimens were used. After native testing, prototype components of a new PCL-retaining implant were implanted using navigation and a bone-referenced technique. After finishing the bone cuts of tibia and femur, the spacer was inserted in flexion and positioned on the anterior edge of the bony surface to measure the step-off. If necessary, an extra cut was made to balance the PCL. The specimen was mounted on the knee kinematics rig and a squat with constant vertical ankle force (130N) and constant medial and lateral hamstrings forces (50N) was performed between 30° and 130° of knee flexion. The trajectories of the reflective tibial and femoral markers were continuously recorded using six infrared cameras. The projections of the femoral condylar centers on the horizontal plane of the tibia were calculated and compared.Introduction
Methods
An important factor in the functional results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the achieved maximal flexion. To date, a TKA still provides dissimilar flexion capabilities compared to the healthy knee, which could be due to the mismatch between the normal knee geometry and the implant geometry. The implant design of the Journey (Smith&Nephew) aims to replicate the normal knee function. According to the manufacturer of the Journey system, it intends to replicate PCL and ACL function, accommodates deep flexion, induces normal tibiofemoral axial rotation and provides proper patellar tracking throughout the entire range of flexion (‘guided motion’). The objective of this study is to investigate the maximal knee flexion one year after surgery of the Journey and its predecessor the Genesis II (Smith&Nephew). In addition, clinical and functional outcomes will be evaluated. A total of 124 patients presenting with noninflammatory osteoarthritis received the Journey or the Genesis II prosthesis, by randomization. The primary outcome was defined as the maximum flexion angle on a lateral X-ray performed with the patient lying on a bench and using manual force on bending the knee. Secondary outcomes were: active flexion (lying and standing), Knee Society System score (KSS), Patella Scoring System (PSS), number of adverse events (AE) and satisfaction. The changes in KSS and PSS between the pre-operative situation and 1 year after surgery were calculated as: δKSS = KSS1 year – KSSpre-op, and δPSS = PSS1 year – PSSpre-op. Two-sided t-tests and non-parametric alternatives were performed in order to test for differences between the Journey and the Genesis II group.Introduction
Methods
