Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine whether patella replacement or RAP of the patella is advantageous in TKA.

Methods: 100 patients were recruited to enter a randomised, prospective, double blind clinical trial to determine the efþcacy of patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty. All patients receive the same posterior cruciatesparing prosthesis, and all operations were performed by, or under the direct supervision of the þrst author. Evaluation consisted of the determination of the HSS-Score, the knee society scores, speciþc questions relating to patellafemoral symptoms, radiographs, measurement of torques and stability of one leg standing. All knees were followed at 3 month and 18 month postoperatively.

Results: There was no signiþcant difference between the two groups with regard to the HSS-Score, and the KS-scores. Excentric and concentric torques were higher in the group with RAP of the patella. One leg standing was more stable in the group with RAP of the patella. In both groups one patient complained of severe anterior knee pain. The patient with RAP of the patellar was treated successfully with secondary patella resurfacing.

Conclusions: The clinical outcome and the prevalence of anterior knee pain after TKA with the PFC-∑ knee was not inßuenced by whether or not the patella had been resurfaced. Force and balance are slightly better after TKA with RAP of the patella.

Correct alignment is important for success in total knee replacement. Currently this is achieved by a combination of intramedullary and extramedullary alignment using jigs and cutting blocks. This multicentre study evaluates the use of computer assisted planning and the interactive guidance of instruments for total knee replacement.

Prior to surgery computer scans of the hip, knee and ankle were performed of patients enrolled in the study. Pre operative planning of the position and size of the knee components was performed by the surgeon using a CT based Vector Vision Navigation System (Brain LAB AG, Heimstetten, Germany). P.F.C.x (De Puy Leeds UK) knee replacements were then implanted in 38 patients. Surgery was carried out according to the standard surgical technique using traditional instruments. Information of the planned and intraoperatively recorded position of the cutting blocks were analysed to check varus/valgus alignment, flexion/extension alignment, the amount of planned resection from both the femoral and tibial bones and the size of the components. Information from all the separate centres was sent to a central data processing base for analysis.

Results were calculated comparing the differences between the planned and performed cuts for each of the different variables studied. Graphs demonstrate the differences in the alignment between that planned by the surgical navigation system and what was actually carried out by the instrumented cuts.

Based on the data obtained from the multicentre study we have concluded that the planned position of the implants using the standard instruments was similar to that using the Vector Vision Navigation System. We believe that it is safe to proceed with surgical navigation total knee arthroplasty using the P.F.C.x total knee prosthesis with Image Guided Surgery and a further multicentre study is currently underway evaluating this.