Improved surgical techniques and new fixation methods have revived interest in high tibial osteotomy surgery in recent years. Our aim was to review our first 59 cases. All patients underwent radiological and clinical review including pre and post operative scores.

Mean age at surgery was 43 (22-59) and mean follow up is 22 months.

The mean pre-operative limb alignment was 5.4° varus (range 1°-16°) with correction to 2° valgus (range -1° - 7°).

HTO is known to increase tibial slope and in this series the change in tibial slope from -5.2° (95%CI: -6.36 to -4.07)) to -7.8° (-8.83 to –6.89) was statistically significant. p= 0.0014 (Mann Whitney).

Patellar height is often reduced following opening wedge HTO and this is confirmed in our series. The Blackburne-Peel ratio changed from 0.74 to 0.58 and the Caton-Descamps from 0.83 to 0.7. Both were statistically significant at p<0.0001 and p=0.0001 respectively.

All scores improved post operatively, the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome (KOOS) from 48 (8-91) to 73 (27-96), the Oxford knee score (OKS) from 25 (3-47) to 37 (9-48), and the EQ5D from 189809 (11221-32333) to 14138 (11111-22233) with the EQ5D VAS improving from 58 to 75. There was no correlation between change in limb alignment, tibial slope or patellar height and any of the scores used.

There were three superficial wound infections, and one non union which was treated with grafting and re fixation. Six patients have had their plate removed.

Improvement in clinical scores in these patients confirms that medial opening wedge HTO is a reliable joint preserving procedure in the short term and our surgical technique is reproducible and consistent with other published series.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare two methods of femoral fixation for four strand Hamstring (4SH) primary ACL reconstruction: namely a recently introduced suspensory fixation using absorbable polylactic acid cross pins versus our traditional method of anchor fixation.

Method: Forty-five consecutive patients, who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction using 4SH graft and the suspensory femoral fixation were prospectively evaluated by an independent observer. IKDC scores were recorded and laxity was assessed using cruciometer. These results were compared with a similar well-matched cohort of patients whose femoral fixation was with an anchor. Tibial fixation in both the groups was similar.

Results: No significant difference was noted between the two groups on comparison of IKDC scores or cruciometer readings at a minimum one-year follow-up.

Conclusions: This suspensory method of femoral fixation for a four-strand hamstring graft provided a secure fixation with satisfactory early clinical results. As this method of fixation is a new technique, further follow-up is needed for long-term validation.

Introduction: Number of patients needing revision ACL surgery has increased more than 10 fold. Results of revision surgery are traditionally thought to be inferior to primary reconstruction. Aim of this paper is to describe results of revision surgery using a two-stage technique and compare it with results of primary ACL reconstruction. Materials and Methods: We studied 44 consecutive patients with revision ACL surgery. They had 10 ACL reconstruction elsewhere using autologous (34) or prosthetic ligament (10). Rrevision surgery was two staged. First of debridement and bone grafting and second stage after 3 mths of meniscal and chondral work along with ACL reconstruction using autograft. We compared this group with a similar cohort of patients with primary ACL surgery. Conclusions: A two-stage revision technique for revision ACL surgery allows accurate assessment & opportunity for the bone graft to heal to provide good bed for graft fixation at the time of second procedure.