It is still controversial whether one or two-stage revision should be indicated for deeply infected hip prosthesis, and there are no scoring systems for the decision of them. An assessment system for the treatment of deeply infected hip prosthesis was evaluated for the patients who had undergone one or two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Between February 2001 and November 2009, revision THA for deep infection was carried out in 60 hips on 59 patients by the senior authors. Nineteen hips underwent one-stage revision THA using antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement (ALAC), and 41 hips did two-stage revision THA using ALAC beads, based on the criteria by Jackson and Schmalzried. This study included 47 revisions in 47 patients for which a minimum follow-up of two years (average 4.7 years). Six parameters were employed in the assessment system: 1) general condition, 2) duration of infection, 3) wound complication after initial operation, 4) microorganism, 5) C-reactive protein (CRP), and 6) necessity for grafting bone. Each parameter ranged from 0 to 2 points, giving a full score of 12 points. Healing was defined as the lack of clinical signs and symptoms of infection, a CRP level < 10 mg/l or an erythrocyte sedimentation rate < 20 mm/h, and the absence or radiological signs of infection at the follow-up visit > 24 months after first revision, described by Giulieri et al.Introduction
Materials and Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of vascularized iliac bone grafting for idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. We reviewed the clinical and radiological results of 35 operations performed on 29 patients who had osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in which a pedicle iliac bone grafting was performed for minimum follow-up of 10 years. The average age was 35 years (range, 17 to 62 years). According to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association classification for ONFH, there were 28 stage 2, 7 stage 3-A, 17 type C-1 hips, and 18 type C-2 hips. After a bone tunnel of 1.5 × 5 cm was made in the anterior aspect of the femoral head and curettage of necrotic lesion was performed, the pedicle bone with the deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) was inserted into the anterolateral portion of the femoral head. The average follow-up period was 13 years and 6 months. Weight bearing was not allowed for 2 months after the operation. Survival rate of the femoral head was calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods, and collapse of the femoral head and configuration of the femoral head was investigated at final follow-up.Introduction
Methods
The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has recently seen a paradigm shift with the introduction of biologic therapy, but there is concern that this will result in an increased incidence of infection. The occurrence of infection in RA patients who have undergone biologic therapy has recently been documented in a few reports, but this is the first report of Salmonella infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a RA patient receiving etanercept therapy. Here we report the successful treatment of a rare case of Salmonella septic arthritis. A 61-year-old man with a 4-year history of RA was treated with methylprednisolone and methotrexate, and he consulted us because of right gonalgia. Treatment with infliximab was started, but as this was not effective, his medication was changed sequentially to etanercept 6 months later. Finally, TKA was performed on the right knee with antibiotic-loaded acryl cement (ALAC). The postoperative course was uneventful, etanercept was administered routinely from the 2nd postoperative week. The patient was discharged after 4 weeks. Five weeks after TKA, however, the patient visited us because of acute swelling and tenderness around the right knee. His laboratory values included a white blood cell count of 9300/mm3, an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 81.0 mm/h and a C-reactive protein level of 11.3 mg/dl. Fluid obtained by joint aspiration was cloudy and dark-yellow, and prosthetic joint infection was diagnosed. The patient underwent emergency debridement by arthroscopic surgery, followed immediately by injection of 0.5 g carbapenem every 12 hours and continuous closed irrigation-suction of the joint for 2 weeks. Culture of the joint fluid revealed Salmonella enteritidis infection, which was not sensitive to aminoglycoside which we used as ALAC. The patient was treated with intravenous carbapenem for 3 weeks, oral levofloxacin at a daily dose of 300 mg for 2 weeks successively, and oral minocycline at 200 mg daily for 3 months. At follow-up 12 months after surgery, physical and blood examinations and plain radiographs demonstrated no recurrence of the infection, and the patient has resumed taking etanercept. The range of flexion in the treated knee is 0 to 145 degrees. Salmonella arthritis is classified as septic arthritis and reactive arthritis, and septic arthritis is more likely if Salmonella is identified by culture of joint fluid. Salmonella septic arthritis has not been considered an intraoperative contaminant during joint replacement. Recently, it has become apparent that biologic therapies can play major roles in the pathogenesis of RA, and also that immuno-suppressive drugs may become risk factors for Salmonella septic arthritis. In conclusion, our patient had a successful outcome after prompt debridement and treatment with appropriate antibiotics, without the need for implant removal. It is important to be mindful of the possibility of infection and to carry out surgery immediately if a patient presents with symptoms after biologic therapy.
