Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 43 - 43
1 May 2016
Bischoff J Wernle J Marra G Verborgt O
Full Access

Introduction

Good outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) rely in part on stability of the humeral component. Traditionally humeral components have been cemented, however there has been recent interest in press-fit fixation of humeral components in RSA. Lateralization of the head center in RSA can impart larger moments on the humeral component than for anatomic reconstructions, increasing the importance of distal humeral canal preparation for implant stability. To date, the primary stability of any type of press-fit humeral prosthesis has been largely unexplored. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of over-reaming the distal humeral canal in a press-fit humeral component in RSA.

Methods

Computed tomography (CT) data of the shoulder were obtained from 55 shoulders. Images were segmented to produce digital models of the humerus. Humeral components for RSA (2mm diameter size increments) were sized and placed per the surgical technique, including preparation of the humerus with the appropriate reamers (1mm increments). Finite element models for each specimen were created with heterogeneous bone properties derived from the CT scan. Pressfit between the bone and stem was resolved to quantify the initial contact pressure on the stem; each stem was then loaded at 566N oriented 20° lateral and 45° anterior. Overall motion of the stem was measured, as well as interfacial micromotion in the porous coating region (Fig. 1). The effect of line-to-line (L2L) reaming and over-reaming by 1 mm was evaluated using an unpaired Student's t-test, with significance defined at p<0.05.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 397 - 397
1 Dec 2013
Levy J Keppler L Verborgt O Declercq G Frankle M
Full Access

Background and Motivation

Accurate placement of glenoid components in reverse and total shoulder arthroplasty has been shown to reduce the risk of implant failure (1, 2, 6). Surgical techniques and literature describe methods to determine favorable positions for implant placement (3, 4, 5) but achieving that position surgically remains a challenge. Placement of glenoid components is faced with the challenge of variable glenoid morphology on which conventional instrumentation does not always provide a reliable reference (6, 7, 8). Limited surgical exposure is another challenge since many anatomic landmarks are not visible to the surgeon to use as spacial reference. Anatomic landmarks and angles can be more reliabily selected on CT scans with 3-dimentional reconstruction (9,10) yet few methods allow for the reproducible translation of these plans to surgery. Navigation has produced better accuracy and lower variability than conventional instrumentation (11), yet its regular usage remains limited, especially in the shoulder.

Methods

A patient specific planning and guiding system has been developed for glenoid implant placement of total and reverse shoulder arthoplasty procedures. This method allows for preoperative planning on a patient specific virtual 3D model of the scapula derived from CT images (Figure 1), and guided placement of a pin which which serves as the central axis for determining proper implant position. An initial implant position was presented on the virtual model based on the methods described by the surgical technique of the corresponding procedure. These plans were either approved or adapted to a desired position within the planning software by the surgeons. Using this planned position as input, patient specific surgical guides were created which fit onto the exposed anatomy and guide the drilling of the pin (Figure 1). This method was tested on 14 cadavers, with attention directed to translation of the starting point from the original plan, the ability to reproduce the intended degree of inferior tilt, and the ability to reproduce the glenoid version angle.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 278 - 278
1 Jul 2008
VERBORGT O EL-ABIAD R GAZIELLY D
Full Access

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to assess long-term clinical and radiological outcome of humeral stems inserted without cement for shoulder arthroplasty.

Material and methods: The series included 37 shoulder arthroplasties (11 simple humerus prostheses and 26 total shoulder arthroplasties) performed between 1985 and 1998. Press-fit humeral stems were used for these patients with primary and posttraumatic shoulder degeneration and osteonecrosis. There were 13 Neer II (3M) prostheses and 24 Modular Shoulder prostheses (3M) which were designed for implantation with cement. Mean follow-up was 9.2 years (range 5.8–13.6 years). This series included 22 women and 15 men, mean age 57.7 years (range 33–82). The Constant score and the Neer classification were noted. Lucent lines, endosoteal erosion, and stem migration or tilt were noted on plain x-rays. A stem was considered ‘at risk’ of loosening in the presence of tilt or migration or lucent lines measuring > 2 mm in > 3 zones.

Results: At last follow-up, the mean non-weighted Constant score was 57/100 (16/95) and according to Neer, outcome was satisfactory in 70%. There was no complication and no revision related to the cementless stem was needed. The radiographic analysis failed to identify any stem migration. Lucent lines were observed for 22 components (59%), endosteal erosion for 12 (32%) and tilt for 5 (14%). Seven stems were considered at risk (19%). The prevalence of at risk stems was not correlated with patient-related or disease-related features, nor to the type of prosthesis, the length of follow-up or clinical outcome in terms of pain, Constant score or Neer classification.

Discussion: Neer initially designed a humeral component to be inserted with cement. This technique provided a humeral fixation which was very reliable, with very few loosenings reported. It was nevertheless very difficult to remove the cemented stem. For this reason, certain surgeons continued to use these stems designed for cemented implantation in a press-fit manner for simple humeral prostheses and for total shoulder arthroplasty.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the favorable results obtained using these press-fit stems for shoulder arthroplasty. The rate of clinical looseninf was low at long-term follow-up.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 278 - 278
1 Jul 2008
VERBORGT O EL-ABIAD R GAZIELLY D
Full Access

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to compare mid-term results after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) versus simple humeral arthroplasty (SHA) for the treatment of primary centered osteoarthritic degeneration of the shoulder joint.

Material and methods: The series included 41 Aequalis prostheses (27 TSA, 14 SHA) implanted by the same surgeon. TSA was performed in 21 women and six men, mean age 68.3 years (range 51–78). SHA was performed in nine women and five men, mean age 68.3 years (range 58–83). The glenoid cavity presented concentric wear (type A) in 70% and asymmetric wear (type B) in 30% of patients undergoing TSA. Type A wear was observed in 57% of the patients undergoing SHA and type B (or C) wear in 43% of them. Mean follow-up was 35 months (range 24–49) for TSA and 37 months (24–59) for SHA. The Constant score and the Neer classification were noted. The position of the implants and lucent lines was noted on plain x-rays.

Results: For the TSA patients, the mean non-weighted Constant score was 82/100 points (gain of 48 points), anterior elevation was 151° (gain 54°), and active external rotation 44° (gain 29°). For the SHA patients, the mean non-weighted Constant score was 71/100 points (gain 41 points), active anterior elevation 135° (ain 46°), and active external rotation 43° (gain 28°). The Neer classification demonstrated excellent or satisfactory outcome for 93% of the TSA patients and 86% of the SHA patients. TSA was more effective than SHA for pain relief (p=0.045). Periglenoid lucent lines were observed for 63% of the TSA but with no loosening or complication for the glenoid component at last follow-up.

Discussion: Compared with a simple humeral prosthesis, total shoulder arthroplasty was more effective for the treatment of primary centered osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint.