header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 114 - 114
2 Jan 2024
Maglio M Tschon M Sartori M Martini L Rocchi M Dallari D Giavaresi G Fini M
Full Access

The use of implant biomaterials for prosthetic reconstructive surgery and osteosynthesis is consolidated in the orthopaedic field, improving the quality of life of patients and allowing for healthy and better ageing. However, there is the lack of advanced innovative methods to investigate the potentialities of smart biomaterials, particularly for the study of local effects of implant and osteointegration. Despite the complex process of osseointegration is difficult to recreate in vitro, the growing challenges in developing alternative models require to set-up and validate new approaches. Aim of the present study is to evaluate an advanced in vitro tissue culture model of osteointegration of titanium implants in human trabecular bone. Cubic samples (1.5×1.5 cm) of trabecular bone were harvested as waste material from hip arthroplasty surgery (CE AVEC 829/2019/Sper/IOR); cylindrical defects (2 mm Ø, 6 mm length) were created, and tissue specimens assigned to the following groups: 1) empty defects- CTR-; 2) defects implanted with a cytotoxic copper pin (Merck cod. 326429)- CTR+; 3) defects implanted with standard titanium pins of 6 µm-rough (ZARE S.r.l) -Ti6. Tissue specimens were cultured in mini rotating bioreactors in standard conditions, weekly assessing viability. At the 8-week-timepoint, immunoenzymatic, microtomographic, histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed. The model was able to simulate the effects of implantation of the materials, showing a drop in viability in CTR+, differently from Ti6 which appears to have a trophic effect on the bone. MicroCT and histological analysis supported the results, with lower BV/TV and Tb.Th values observed in CTR- compared to CTR+ and Ti6 and signs of matrix and bone deposition at the implant site. The collected data suggest the reliability of the tested model which can recreate the osseointegration process in vitro and can therefore be used for preliminary evaluations to reduce and refine in vivo preclinical models.

Acknowledgment: This work was supported by Emilia-Romagna Region for the project “Sviluppo di modelli biologici in vitro ed in silico per la valutazione e predizione dell'osteointegrazione di dispositivi medici da impianto nel tessuto osseo”


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 58 - 58
1 Mar 2005
Giardino R Fini M Giavaresi G Aldini NN Martini L Torricelli P Guzzardella A Borsari V Tschon M
Full Access

When investigating orthopaedic biomaterials and tissue engineered devices, biological investigations by means of in vitro and in vivo tests are mandatory to obtain a overall picture of biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy. However, various aspects requiring careful consideration should be kept in mind and can explain the complex situations encountered by researchers when the skeletal tissue is involved. This presentation aimed to summarize some useful information in improving in vivo methodology to test present and future therapies for orthopaedic surgery. Some in vivo biological tests to study innovative reconstructive surgical techniques are summarized on the basis of the experience of the Experimental Surgery Department –IOR.

After in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility tests, for the study of bone defect healing and of biomaterial osteo-inductive properties the subcutaneous and intramuscular implants are usually performed in laboratory animals while osteoconduction and bone healing evaluation require the development of “nonunions” (sites that never achieve functional bone continuity) and “critical size defects” (the smallest defect that will heal with less than 10% bony growth) models. Biomaterial osteointegration properties are investigated by means of metaphyseal, diaphyseal and intramedullary implantation. The use of pathological animals is also recommended to take into account the clinical situation where biomaterials are often implanted in aged and osteoporotic patients. As far as articular cartilage pathology is concerned, chondral and osteochondral “critical size defects” may be performed and the development of osteoarthritic animals could be also useful.

At different experimental times post-explantation evaluations by means of radiology, histology, histomorphometry and biomechanics provide a complete characterization of biomaterials and biotechnologies showing their potential therapeutic efficacy for skeletal reconstruction.

In vivo studies provide important pre-clinical information on new biomaterials and biotechnologies for the skeletal reconstruction Among the factors that are increasingly improving the reliability of in vivo testing are the continuous improvement in knowledge on bone biology and comparative science between humans and animals, the awareness that animal suffering should be reduced as much as possible, and, finally, the amount and the accuracy of in vivo post-explantation findings.