Spinal metastatic disease can result in burst fracture and neurologic compromise. This study aims to examine the effects of tumour location, shape and surface texture on burst fracture risk in the metastatic spine using a parametric poroelastic finite element model. Tumours were found to be most hazardous in the posterior region of the vertebral body, whereas the multiple tumour scenarios reduced risk. Tumour shape may affect the mechanism of burst fracture. Serrated and smooth outer tumour surfaces yielded similar trends. These results can be used to improve guidelines for burst fracture risk assessment in patients with spinal metastases.

This study aims to examine the effects of tumour location, shape and surface texture on burst fracture risk in the metastatic spine.

Both tumour location and shape are important factors in assessing the risk of burst fracture in the meta-static spine.

Improving risk prediction may reduce burst fracture in patients with spinal metastases.

Vertebral bulge increased over 30% when the tumour was moved posteriorly. Conversely, for the multi-tumour scenarios, vertebral bulge and axial displacement decreased by 41% and 35% in comparison to a single central tumour. Anterior and lateral movement demonstrated only small effects. Vertebral bulge increased proportionally to mediolateral tumour length and axial displacement increased proportionally to superior-inferior tumour length. Similar trends were seen with smoothed and serrated tumour surfaces.

Using a parametric poroelastic finite element model of a metastaticaly involved T7 spinal motion segment, fourteen single and two multi-tumour scenarios were analyzed, each comprising approximately 24% tumour volume. Ellispoidal tumours were positioned in central, anterior, posterior and lateral locations. Tumour shape was altered by adjusting tumour radii for a centrally located tumour. Tumours were modeled using smoothed and serrated outer surface configurations. Burst fracture risk was assessed by measuring maximum vertebral bulge and axial displacement under load.

Tumours were found to be most hazardous in the posterior region of the vertebral body, whereas the multi-tumour scenarios reduced risk. Modeling of tumour surface texture did not impact shape or location effects. Tumour shape may affect the mechanism of burst fracture.

Funding: This study was supported by the National Science and Engineering Research Council.

Purpose: The mechanical integrity of vertebral bone is compromised when metastatic cancer cells migrate to the spine, rendering it susceptible to burst fracture under physiologic loading. Risk of burst fracture has been shown to be dependent on the magnitude of the applied load, however limited work has been conducted to determine the effect of load type on the stability of the metastatic spine. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of multiple loading conditions and the presence of the ribcage on a metastatically-involved thoracic spinal motion segment.

Methods: A parametric biphasic finite element model was developed and validated against experimental data under axial compressive loading. Fifteen loading scenarios were analysed, including axial compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending, torsion, and combined loads. Axial loads were applied up to 800N and moment loads up to 2Nm. Multiple analyses were conducted with and without the ribcage to assess its impact on thoracic spinal stability. Vertebral bulge (VB) and load induced canal narrowing (LICN) were utilised as main outcome parameters to assess burst fracture risk.

Results: For single loads, pure 800N axial loading yielded the highest level of VB (0.48mm) and LICN (0.26mm). The smallest increases in VB were measured in 1Nm pure flexion (0.018mm). Combined loading scenarios also demonstrated that axial loading is the principal factor contributing to VB, as changes in VB for combined loads were no greater than 4.35% of VB under axial loading alone. Inclusion of the ribcage was found to reduce the potential for burst fracture by 27% under axial load.

Conclusions: Axial loading is the predominant load type leading to increased risk of burst fracture initiation. Rotational loading (bending, flexion and extension) led to only moderate increases in risk. The ribcage provides substantial stability to reduce overall risk of burst fracture. These findings are important in developing a more comprehensive understanding of burst fracture mechanics in the metastatic spine and in directing future modeling efforts. The results in this study may also be useful in advising less harmful activities for patients affected by lytic spinal metastases.

Funding : Other Education Grant

Funding Parties : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council

Purpose: Stability of thoracic vertebrae affected by metastatic disease has been shown to be dependent on tumour size and bone density, but additional structural and geometric factors may also play a role in burst fracture risk assessment. The objective of this study was to use parametric finite element modeling to determine the effects of vertebral level, geometry, and metastatic compromise to the cortical shell on the risk of burst fracture initiation in the thoracic spine.

Methods: An experimentally validated parametric biphasic finite element model of a metastatically involved spinal motion segment was analysed with scenarios representing motion segments from T2-T4 through T10-T12. Variations in vertebral geometry, kyphotic angulation and endplate angulation were evaluated. Additionally, four scenarios with transcortical breach of the tumour were compared to a central tumour scenario to determine the effect of cortical destruction. Vertebral bulge (VB), load induced canal narrowing (LICN), and posterior wall tensile hoop strain (PWTHS) were utilised as the main outcome parameters to assess burst fracture risk.

Results: Burst fracture risk outcome parameters were largest in upper vertebrae, decreasing inferiorly at each subsequent level, with T11 exhibiting a 35.5% decrease in VB relative to T3, despite greater applied loads. An increase in endplate angles led to a 6.59% decrease in VB and a 2.38% decrease in LICN. A 5° increase in kyphotic angle further decreased VB and LICN by 7.29% and 4.34% respectively. Transcortical tumour scenarios led to an average decrease in PWTHS of 25.8%.

Conclusions: Patients affected by spinal metastases in upper thoracic vertebrae may be at greater risk of burst fracture. Decreased burst fracture risk with greater thoracic kyphotic angulation may be due to a change in loading direction for curved segments, reducing the amount of pure axial load applied. Decreased tensile hoop strains are generated during loading of transcortical tumours. This may be attributed to large deformation of tumour tissue through the breach in the cortical shell, reducing the potential for burst fracture. Improved burst fracture risk assessment in the thoracic spine may motivate more informed clinical decision-making.

Funding : Other Education Grant

Funding Parties : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council