The mid-term results of kinematic alignment (KA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using image derived instrumentation (IDI) have not been reported in detail, and questions remain regarding ligamentous stability and revisions. This paper aims to address the following: 1) what is the distribution of alignment of KA TKAs using IDI; 2) is a TKA alignment category associated with increased risk of failure or poor patient outcomes; 3) does extending limb alignment lead to changes in soft-tissue laxity; and 4) what is the five-year survivorship and outcomes of KA TKA using IDI? A prospective, multicentre, trial enrolled 100 patients undergoing KA TKA using IDI, with follow-up to five years. Alignment measures were conducted pre- and postoperatively to assess constitutional alignment and final implant position. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain and function were also included. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry was used to assess survivorship.Aims
Methods
Patellar resurfacing was combined with realignment and an ‘anteriorisation’ procedure in 77 knees. We found that 96.7 % of repairs for grades I &
II disease were seen with rods on the patella, when combined with a mechanical correction, compared with 66.0%, when used on the patella without a realignment procedure. However, when the use of pads was combined with mechanical corrections the score was 76% and a lower proportion were grade I repairs (13%) than with rods (30.0%). The mean Waddell Score (0–4) was 2.9. From the survey 81.8% regarded the procedure as worthwhile and 9.1% were doubtful.