The use of piperacillin/tazobactam with vancomycin as empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), leading to propose cefepim as an alternative since 2017 in our reference center. The present study compared microbiological efficacy and tolerance of these two EAT strategies. All patients with PJI empirically treated by vancomycin-cefepim (n=90) were prospectively enrolled in an observational study, and compared with vancomycin-piperacillin/tazobactam-treated historical controls (n=117), regarding: i) the proportion efficacious empirical regimen (i.e., at least one of the two molecules active against the identified organism(s) based on Aim
Method
We performed a retrospective cohort study in 4 hospitals and included patients with staphylococcal acute post-operative (< 1 month) PJI treated with DAIR in 2011–2016 period. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis and Kaplan Meier curves were used to determine the risk factors for treatment failure (persistence of clinical signs, new surgery w/o persistence or superinfection, infection-related death).Aim
Method
All adult patients with proven Aim
Method
Current guidelines recommend the combination of vancomycin with either piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) or a third generation cephalosporin (3GC) as empirical antimicrobial therapy of PJI, immediately after surgery. However, clinical and biological safeties of such high dose-combinations are poorly known. All patients managed in a reference center in France between 2011 and 2016 receiving an empirical antimicrobial therapy for PJI were included in a prospective cohort study. Antimicrobial-related AE upcoming during the empirical treatment phase were describe according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCEA), and severe ones (grade ≥ 3) were reported to pharmacovigilance. AE determinants were assessed using univariate logistic regression.Aim
Method
A two-stage surgical strategy (debridement-negative pressure therapy (NPT) and flap coverage) with prolonged antimicrobial therapy is usually proposed in pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis but has not been widely evaluated. Adult patients with pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis treated by a two-stage surgical strategy were included in a retrospective cohort study. Determinants of superinfection (i.e., additional microbiological findings at reconstruction) and treatment failure were assessed using binary logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis.Aim
Method
