Thoracoplasty has been described as primarily a cosmetic resection of the rib hump. The purpose of our study was to investigate whether removal of a normal spine stabilizer affected the correction of the spine, particularly in the sagittal plane. Thirty-eight adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent thoracoplasty were compared with eighteen controls in terms of maintenance of correction and patient satisfaction using the SRS questionnaire. Thoracoplasty had no effect on curve correction in the coronal plane. It did show a significant effect on sagittal plane correction of the thoracic hypokyphosis without any significant detractors in terms of patient outcome To investigate whether thoracoplasty affected spinal correction. We also compared patient outcomes thoracoplasty patients and controls, as well as long-term curve maintenance. Thoracoplasty did increase the correction of thoracic hypokyphosis, without any significant detractors in terms of patient outcome. Current understanding of the scoliotic curve as a three dimensional helix has led to increased recognition of the importance of sagittal contour and balancing the spine’s reciprocal curves to avoid problems such as flat back syndrome. Correction of the scoliotic curve intraoperatively may require the removal of spine stabilizers such as the disc and annulus, posterior facet and capsule, and thoracic cage stabilizers such as the ribs. Thirty-eight patients who had either concave para-median or convex Steel mid-rib thoracoplasty were reviewed and compared to eighteen controls. Prospective patient outcomes using the Scoliosis Research Society instrument with an average of >
one year follow-up were available for thirty patients. Degree of curve settle and maintenance of correction was measured on follow-up radiographs. Thoracoplasty had no effect on curve correction in the coronal plane. It did show a significant effect on sagittal plane correction of thoracic hypokyphosis. The paramedian group showed a mean increase of tweleve degrees, the Steel group 8.7 degrees, and, the control group 3.1 degrees. No significant difference between pain, satisfaction, function, and self-image was found. Long-term radiographic follow-up (average three years) showed a mean coronal curve settle of 4.6 degrees (thoracoplasty) versus 3.1 degrees (non-thoracoplasty), and an accompanying improvement in sagittal plane correction of 4.2 and 3.0 degrees, respectively.
Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common elbow injury in children, usually sustained from a fall on the outstretched hand. Iatrogenic ulnarnerve injury is not uncommon following cross K wiring. NNH is the number of cases needed to treat in order to have one adverse outcome. A systemic review was undertaken to calculate relative risks, risk difference and number needed to harm following management of supracon-dylar fractures with cross or lateral K wires. It was found that there was one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every twenty-seven cases that were managed with crossed K wires. The aim of this study was to calculate the number of cross K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus that would need to be performed for one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury to occur. Iatrogenic ulnarnerve injury is not uncommon following cross K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus. To date there are no clinical trials showing the benefit of cross K wiring over lateral K wiring in the management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. If it can be confirmed that lateral K wiring is as effective as crossed K wiring, iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury can be avoided. A systematic review of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries following management of supracondylar fractures was conducted. The databases MEDLINE 1966 – present, EMBASE 1980 – present, CINAHL 1982 – present, CDSR, and DARE were searched along with a meticulous search of the Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics from 1998 to 2004. Of the two hundred and forty-eight papers identified, only thirty-six met the inclusion criteria. The papers where both lateral crossed K wires were used as treatment were identified for calculating relative rates, risk difference and number needed to harm. NNH was 7.69. When a sensitivity analysis removing two studies that had five subjects or fewer and a 100% ulnar nerve injury rate was peformed, the NNH was 27.7. In other words, there was one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every twenty-seven cases that were managed with crossed K wires.