Purpose: Although transient osteoporosis of the hip was initially described in pregnant women, now most frequently identified in middle-age and older men. Has also been reported to occur in either hip and in both successively. This condition is referred as migratory transient osteoporosis of the hip. In this study the authors describe five cases of migratory hip osteoporosis and the differential diagnosis with osteonecrosis is also discussed.

Material and Methods: Thirty-four patients with transient osteoporosis were presented. Of the 34 patients five had a similar episode of severe pain in the contralateral hip 14 months mean time later. Early bone scans and MRI of the hips had been carried out in all of the patients. After the evaluation of these findings and thorough exclusion of other conditions diagnosis of migratory transient osteoporosis was demonstrated, and confirmed by the natural course of the disease.

Results: All cases were treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications and protected weight-bearing. The course of the disease has not been appreciably altered by medical treatment, and the mean time interval from the onset of symptoms to clinical recovery was 4.6 months (range 3 to 6 months). Imaging findings on MR confirmed the diagnosis during both episodes and paralleled the reduction of pain.

Conclusions: Migratory transient osteoporosis of the hip is a rare self-limited condition of uncertain etiology and pathogenesis, which “migrate” from one hip to the other. Magnetic resonance imaging is highly sensitive in the early detection of this condition and moreover is helpful in the exclusion of other entities. Although the diagnosis is one of exclusion, it must be considered and contrasted with hip osteonecrosis.

Natural history studies of scaphoid non-unions focus on symptomatic non-unions. As a consequence, neither the real incidence nor the long-term sequels of asymptomatic scaphoid pseudarthrosis have been sufficiently studied.

Three adult patients (38, 40 and 79 years of age) with long-standing asymptomatic scaphoid non-union are presented. The lesions were identified in radiographs taken in the accident and emergency department after new injuries. All patients could recall the initial fracture, which occurred 17.5, 20 and 40 years respectively before the index examination.

Although all the patients were heavy manual workers and in two the non-union occurred in their dominant upper extremity, none could recall pain during activities. Radiographic evidence of carpal malalignment and/or arthritis was noted in all patients. At the 3-month follow-up after the new injury all patients remained asymptomatic with only mild limitations in the range of motion.

With evolving trends of ORIF in unstable scaphoid fractures, there is need for larger-scale natural history studies that include asymptomatic scaphoid non-unions. Such lesions are currently poorly understood and their treatment (if one is needed) remains unclear.

Aim: Vascular complications associated with locked intramedullary tibial nailing are rare but always serious. The purpose of this cadaveric study is to define the risk of vascular complications after proximal locking in intramedullary tibial nailing.

Material and Methods: Seven fresh cadaver legs were obtained from the University Hospital of loannina. The Grosse & Kempf Tibial Locking Nail was used with anterior-posterior locking. Each procedure was performed according to a standard protocol. The insertion point of the tibial nail was just above the level of the tibial tuberosity. The direction of the proximal locking screw was oblique from caudal to cranial and from lateral to medial. For imaging, both the nail and screws were removed and titanium screws were inserted, thereby allowing good visualization.

Results: MRI sections combined with CT and 3D-CT have been used to illustrate the findings, as they clearly demonstrate the relationships between the locking screws and adjacent vascular structures. Analysis of these findings highlighted the surgical risks associated with this type of proximal locking and its direction.

Conclusions: Proximal anterior-posterior locking in intramedullary tibial nailing is a hazardous procedure because of the small distance between tibia and vascular structures. The use of a new direction for proximal anterior-posterior locking is recommended.