There is no universally agreed definition of cauda equina syndrome (CES). Clinical signs of CES including direct rectal examination (DRE) do not reliably correlate with cauda equina (CE) compression on MRI. Clinical assessment only becomes reliable if there are symptoms/signs of late, often irreversible, CES. The only reliable way of including or excluding CES is to perform MRI on all patients with suspected CES. If the diagnosis is being considered, MRI should ideally be performed locally in the District General Hospitals within one hour of the question being raised irrespective of the hour or the day. Patients with symptoms and signs of CES and MRI confirmed CE compression should be referred to the local spinal service for emergency surgery.

CES can be subdivided by the degree of neurological deficit (bilateral radiculopathy, incomplete CES or CES with retention of urine) and also by time to surgical treatment (12, 24, 48 or 72 hour). There is increasing understanding that damage to the cauda equina nerve roots occurs in a continuous and progressive fashion which implies that there are no safe time or deficit thresholds. Neurological deterioration can occur rapidly and is often associated with longterm poor outcomes. It is not possible to predict which patients with a large central disc prolapse compressing the CE nerve roots are going to deteriorate neurologically nor how rapidly. Consensus guidelines from the Society of British Neurological Surgeons and British Association of Spinal Surgeons recommend decompressive surgery as soon as practically possible which for many patients will be urgent/emergency surgery at any hour of the day or night.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1390–4

Objective: To reassess whether the Ranawat IIIB (quadriparetic, non-ambulant) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with cervical myelopathy patients should be surgically treated.

Study Design: Retrospective study

Subjects: Over a 12-year period (1988–1999), 51 patients [15 M: 36F; mean age 64 years] in Ranawat IIIB with RA were diagnosed to have cervical myelopathy. These included 47 patients with atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) [15 with AAS alone, 10 with basilar invagination (BI), 18 with associated subaxial subluxation (SAS) and four patients with BI and SAS] and four patients with SAS alone.

Results: Thirty-two patients considered fit for surgery successfully underwent operative treatment (Group 1). All underwent posterior instrumented fixation with or without transoral odontoid peg excision. Postoperatively 22/27 patients were pain free and 21/32 patients initially non-ambulant were able to walk. 3/26 patients died within six months of surgery. 13/19 patients managed conservatively (Group 2) because of medical complications died within six months of presentation.

Conclusions: Even in advanced stages of cervical myelopathy in RA, surgical intervention is beneficial with significantly higher morbidity/mortality in conservatively managed patients.