The choice of the surgical exposure in total hip arthroplasties for osteoarthritis is a significant parameter for a successful outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate complications or/and advantages related to the most often used approaches for total hip arthroplasties: the direct lateral or transgluteal (Hardinge) and the posterior (Moore) one. During the period 1997–2000, 50 patients with lateral approach and 50 patients with posterior approach were randomly selected from a pool of 394 total hip arthroplasties (382 patients). Patients with surgery of the contralateral hip were excluded. The mean age of the patients was 72 years (62–84 years) and the indication was degenerative osteoarthritis. The operating time and the postoperative, early and late, complications were studied. The average follow-up was 18 months (12–24 months) and included clinical and radiographic control. The mean operating time was 76 min. (63–91 min.) and 92 min. (83–110 min.) for lateral and posterior approach, respectively. Complications (early and late) associated with transgluteal approach were 16 patients with positive trendelenburg sign, which disappeared within one year post op, 8 with sympathetic knee effusion which subsided within 6 weeks, 2 with ectopic periarticular ossification and 1 with severe thigh pain. In total hip arthroplasties with posterior approaches, 4 cases were complicated with ectopic ossification, 3 with sympathetic knee effusion which subsided within 4 weeks, 2 with posterior dislocation which needed revision surgery and 2 with peroneal nerve paresis which recovered within 6 months. Except for the trendelenburg sign (p<
0.001), all the other complications did not differ statistically significantly (p>
0.05). In conclusion, the posterior approach seems to be related with more severe postoperative complications compared to the transgluteal approach. The gluteus medius’ loss of strength (responsible for limping in equal legs’ length), could be treated with prompt strengthening of the muscle within the first postoperative year.
The purpose of this study was the investigation and treatment of all the complications that may occur from the epidural postoperative analgesia in patients who have undergone major orthopaedic surgery. From October 1999 to April 2002, 200 patients ASA I- III, aged 45–90 (average 72) were studied. They all received postoperative epidural analgesia and were given a mixture of local anaesthetic and Opioid analgesic, more specifically Ropivacaine 2% 10 ml/h and Morphine 0, 1 ug/h via the epidural catheter by means of a stable infusion pump. The analgesic effect covers the patients for the first 2–3 postoperative days and permits earlier and pain free mobilization and physiotherapy. The analgesic result of this method was completely satisfactory with a mean of VAS 96. The most frequent side-effects were nausea and vomiting. Pruritus, mild hypotension, hypaesthesia and motor blockage were documented as well but in a very small percentage. No case of respiratory depression or medical toxicity was mentioned, neither epidural haematoma nor infection due to the placement of epidural catheter. The complications during the recovery phase were treated easily by discontinuation of the infusion or by symptomatic therapy. Epidural analgesia with a steady infusion pump is a secure method of analgesia. However it is of great importance that the patient is informed about the epidural anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia, in a such a way as to attain his/ her consent, participation and collaboration for the best therapeutic result.