Background: Sacral tumours are commonly diagnosed late and therefore are often large and at an advanced stage before treatment is instituted. The late presentation means that curative surgical excision is technically demanding¹. Total en-bloc sacrectomy is fraught with potential complications: deep infection, substantial blood loss, large bone and soft tissue defects, bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction, spinal-pelvic non-union, and gait disturbance². The aim of the current study was two-fold: firstly to detail the technique used by the senior author and chronicle how this has evolved; and secondly to present the complications and outcome of nine total en bloc sacrectomies.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed of total en-bloc sacrectomies between 1991 and 2004. Nine patients (2M, 7F, mean age at surgery 39 years, range 21 – 64yrs) with a diagnosis of primary sacral tumour underwent total en-bloc sacrectomy under the care of the senior author. The mean follow-up was 50.2 months (range: 3.5 – 161 mths). Patients’ functional outcome was evaluated using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument and the SF-36. Intra-operative and postoperative complications (including disease progression) were documented.

Results: Surgical technique has evolved from single stage surgery without and with colostomy to two stage surgery with colostomy. Currently, the first stage includes an anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4/L5 retaining the L5 nerve roots. In the second stage an L4 to pelvic fusion is performed posteriorally. The dura is tied and divided just below the L5 roots. The mean total operating time was 13.3 hrs (range: 8 – 20.1hrs); the mean total blood loss 14.1 ltrs (range: 4.2 – 33 ltrs). There were two revision L4 to pelvic fusions for pseudoarthroses. The mean length of hospital stay was 8.9mths (range: 2 – 36mths). One patient had a recurrence and died 2 years after her surgery. Of the surviving 8 patients the results from the functional outcome scores were variable. Three patients are able to walk independently; the remaining 5 are all mobile but require differing degrees of assistance to walk.

Conclusion: Total en bloc sacrectomy is a major surgical undertaking but our series has shown that it is probably justified in view of the fact that 8 out of 9 patients have had no tumour recurrence and all are able to walk.

Objective: To document the incidence of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation in the lumbar spine as it has been postulated that this can lead to long term deterioration There has been no study so far determining this incidence.

Design: Patients undergoing lumbar fusion were prospectively evaluated with a CT scan and plain radiographs six months following surgery. These were blindly and independantly evaluated by a consultant radiologist and a research fellow.

Subjects: 106 patients (212 top level facet screws) between 1996 and 1999 were evaluated. All patients had their screws and instrumentation inserted through a Wiltse muscle splitting approach and a lateral entry point in the pedicle so as to reduce the risk of facetal impingement. ¹

Outcome Measures: Kappa co-efficient and chi-squared analysis.

Results: The Kappa co-efficient for the CT scan and plain radiographs were 0.88 and 0.39 respectively. On the CT scan both observers noted facet joint impingement in just over 20% of the screws and just over 30% of the patients. The impingement was independent of the level and diagnosis (p> 0.05) and it occurred with uniform incidence in each of the year.

Conclusion: This study raises the theoretical possibility of long term deterioration in the clinical results following the use of transpedicular instrumentaion.

Objectives: To determine if high quality, thin slice (1–3)mm CT scan images would allow proper evaluation of interbody fusion through titanium cages in view of the fact that there are no universally accepted radiological criteria. ¹

Design: Patients undergoing interbody lumbar fusion were prospectively evaluated with a CT scan and plain radiographs six months following surgery. These were blindly and independently evaluated by a consultant radiologist and a research fellow. They were assessed for bridging bony trabeculation both through and surrounding the cages as well as for changes at the cage endplate interface.

Subjects: Fifty-three patients (156 cages) undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion using titanium inter-body cages were evaluated. Posterior elements were used to pack the cages and no graft was packed outside the cages.

Outcome Measures: Kappa co-efficient and chi-squared analysis.

Results: On the CT scan both observers noted bridging trabeculation in 95%of the cages-Kappa 0.85, while on radiographs they were present in only 4%-Kappa 0.74. Both observers also identified bridging trabeculation surrounding the cages on the CT scans in 90%-Kappa 0.82, while on the radiographs this was 8%-Kappa 0.86. Radiographs also did not identify all the loose cages.

Conclusions: High quality CT scan images can demonstrate bridging bony trabeculation following the use of titanium interbody cages. It also demonstrated consistent bone growth outside the cages inspite of not using any bone graft.