Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 5 - 6
1 Sep 2016
Davies R Mace J Talbot C Paton R
Full Access

The aim was to assess the value of the GP 6–8 week hip examination.

In a 15-year prospective observational longitudinal cohort study, every infant referred by the GP with suspected pathological developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) had their hip joints clinically and sonographically examined in a specialist hip screening clinic. Graf Type IV and dislocated hips were classified as pathological. Screening failures were defined as those who had not been identified by the 6–8 week check and presented with late instability. Secondary univariate and multivariable analysis was performed to determine which clinical findings are predictive of instability.

64,518 infants underwent the 6–8 week GP check. Of 176 referrals, 5 had pathological hips. 13 screening failures, presented between the ages of 17 and 80 weeks. The 6–8 week check has a sensitivity of 28% and a specificity of 99.7%.

Univariate analysis revealed positive Ortolani tests and patients referred as ‘unstable hip’ to be significant predictors of hip pathology. Clicky hips, asymmetric skin creases, and leg length inequality were not predictive of pathological hips. A multivariable model showed a positive Ortolani test to be the sole independent predictor of instability at 6–8 weeks.

This is the first attempt to test the validity of the 6–8 week GP clinical hip check. A low rate of hip pathology was identified. The high rate of false negatives raises questions about the value of screening at this age. At 6–8 weeks, clinical signs of hip instability are unreliable as hips become irreducible and stiff.

Based on our findings, we recommend that at 6–8 weeks, referrals are only made if the Ortolani test is positive. We advocate the reintroduction of the 8-month check, including an assessment for limited hip abduction, which may improve the detection rate of those missed by initial screening.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 32 - 32
1 Jan 2014
Clough T Talbot C Siney P Karski M
Full Access

Introduction:

The Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) is a three-component, uncemented implant in widespread use throughout Europe. STAR has achieved encouraging results with short and medium term outcome. We present the long term (13–19 year) results of a consecutive series of 200 STAR ankles.

Methods:

Between November 1993 and February 2000, a total of 200 consecutive STARs were carried out in 184 patients. Patients were followed up both clinically and radiologically, until death or failure, with time to decision to revision or fusion as the endpoint. Pain and function were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot score.