Several stems have been used for revision of total hip replacement (THR). Moreover, management of proximal femoral bone loss at the time of revision THR remains one of the challenges for hip surgeons. Recently, impaction bone grafting has been suggested to resolve this problem, but it is a demanding technique that results in frequent complications. We have used the Wagner self-locking stem with cancellous chip allograft for reconstruction of proximal femoral bone defect during revision surgery since 1992. This study evaluated the midterm results of using Wagner revision stem with bone allograft for femoral revision of THR. We could evaluate forty-one femoral revisions performed between 1992 and 2005 using Wagner revision stem with bone allograft. All patients had been followed for a minimum of three years with a mean follow-up of 8.6 years. Preoperative radiological femoral bone defects were assessed and classified by Gustillo’s classification. Subsidence of the stem was measured on radiograms taken immediately after revision surgery and again at the latest follow-up. Femoral component fixation was graded as radiographic ingrowth, fibrous stable, or unstable according to the criteria described by Engh et al. The incidence of surgical complications was examined. Allografts were assessed for incorporation into host bone as evidenced by trabecular bridging of the host-graft interface. A clear reduction in density or breakdown of the allograft was defined as bone resorption. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. The end point was revision because of mechanical loosening of the stem. Bone defects were classified as: 10 hips type I, 20 hips type II, and 7 hips type III and 4 hips were a periprosthetic fracture. Subsidence was measured at the time of last follow-up in six hips (3, 3, 12, 16, 21, 30 mm). At the latest follow-up 37 of 41 stems were stable. Allograft incorporation could clearly be observed in the proximal femoral bone defects of 31 stems. Three stems were defined as showing bone resorption. Surgical complications included 11 intraoperative fractures, two femoral shafts were perforated during reaming, one dislocation postoperatively, and 3 greater trochanter pseudoarthroses. There was one deep infection, and these cases were excluded from survivorship analysis. One unstable stem and one stem with infection had to be revised. Kaplan-Meier survival was 97.1 % at 10 years. Wagner self-locking stem with allograft for reconstruction for proximal femoral bone defect in revision surgery is a beneficial procedure. However, because there is a high incidence of intraoperative fractures, surgery should be performed carefully.
Management of severe acetabular bone loss at the time of revision total hip replacements (THR) remains has been one of the greater challenges for hip surgeon. Recently, many methods of acetabular reconstruction have been described and various materials are used for supplement of the bone stock deficiency in acetabular revision THR. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm results of the using support ring with bone allografts in acetabular revision THR.
From 1990 to 2005, forty-six acetabular revisions using supporting ring with bone allografts were performed at our institution. All patients were followed up for a minimum of three years with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years. Pre-operative radiological acetabular bone defects were assessed and classified by author’s classification (Itoman’s classification). Radiological analysis involved a general qualitative evaluation. The position of the acetabular reinforcement ring was measured on radiograms, taken immediately after revision surgery and again at the time of last follow-up. Using a MEM template, cranio-central migration and cup inclination angle were measured. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. The end point was revision because of mechanical loosening of the acetabular implant. We used thirty-six Ganz rings, six Müller rings, three Kerboull T-plate and two Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cages. The acetabular bone defects were classified as: 10 hips Type B (central defect), 9 hips Type C (cranial defect), 27 hips Type D (cranial-central defect). Migration of acetabular component was defined as a change of >
5mm in the cranial or central direction of the cup or a change in the cup inclination angle of >
5° at the time of last follow-up. All the Eleven acetabular components which had defined as loose were Type D. One acetabular component was revised because of mechanical loosening, four were revised because of infection, and one was broken polyethylene liner. Kaplan-Meier survivorship of these reconstructions was 96.2 % at 10 years. Allograft reconstruction of acetabular bone defect in revision total hip replacement is beneficial procedure. The remaining pelvic bone is usually in poor condition, therefore, it is necessary to ensure primary fixation with the reinforcement ring with bone allografts.
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical results of the Pin-Sleeve System (AI Wiring System; AIWS) with the Dall-Miles Cable Grip System (DMCGS) for reattachment after dissection of the greater trochanter in hip arthroplasty. The DMCGS was used in 33 cases 35 hips from 1994 to 1998 and AIWS in 40 cases 42 hips from 1998 to 2001. The age at operation was 61.3 years (24 to 85 years) in the DMCGS group and 67 years (24 to 86 years) in the AIWS group. The postoperative follow-up period was 24 months (4 months to 54 months) in the DMCGS group and 30 months (11 months to 42 months) in the AIWS group. Bone union failure of the great trochanter occurred in the DMCGS group eight hips (22.9%) and AIWS group five hips (11.9%). The DMCGS group four hips (11.4%) had broken cables, while not even one case of the AIWS group had them (p<
0.05). Fragments from the cable were found in the DMCGS group seven hips (20%) and AIWS group two hips (4.8%). Bone resorption around the cable, grip or sleeve occurred in the DMCGS group 19 hips (54.3%) and AIWS group five hips (11.9%) (p<
0.05). Clinically, the DMCGS group 13 hips (37.1%) and AIWS group seven hips (16.7%) had dysphoria at the greater trochanter; the DMCGS group 17 hips (48.6%) and AIWS group eight hips (19%) had pain at the greater trochanter in the recumbent position with the affected side down (p<
0.05); the DMCGS group 13 hips (37.1%) and AIWS group six hips (14.3%) had pain on exertion. The AIWS is considered to be a useful implant for reattachment of the greater trochanter compared with the DMCGS.
