A defect following resection of Giant Cell Tumour of the distal radius (GCT-DR) is reconstructed by either vascularised free fibular transfer (VFF) or non-vascularised structural iliac crest transfer (NIC). The purpose of this study was to compare these procedures. Twenty-seven patients at two centres were identified, 14 underwent VFF and 13 NIC. The two groups were comparable for age, sex, and tumour grade. Functional outcomes were assessed with TESS, MSTS, and DASH. In the VFF group, ankle joint morbidity was assessed with the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale. In the NIC group, iliac crest morbidity was assessed with a short questionnaire.Objectives
Methods
Despite aggressive debridement, thorough irrigation, administration of systemic antibiotics and staged treatment, many open fractures still become infected. A graft that can promote bone regeneration and prevent infection could decrease complications. Polyurethane (PUR) scaffolds have been previously shown in separate studies to be non-toxic, osteoconductive, can promote bone growth through BMP delivery and prevent infection by having sustained release of an antibiotic. This scaffold can deliver both BMP and vancomycin simultaneously; the purpose of this study is to determine if the co-delivery of the antibiotic inhibits bone formation. Using an established critical size defect rat femur model, the amount of bone formation created by PUR scaffolds containing low and high doses of rhBMP-2 (2.4 μg and 22.4 μg respectively) and 0.8 mg vancomycin (8% of graft by weight) were compared to scaffolds that contained rhBMP-2 without antibiotics. After 4 weeks, the femurs were harvested and bone growth was assessed using microCT.Background
Methods
