Previous research has indicated that preoperative modification of risk factors associated with obesity may reduce complications after TKA. However, the optimal method is still debated. This study aims to investigate whether a preoperative Risk Stratification Tool (RST) devised by our institution to optimize obese patients can reduce unexpected ICU transfers, and 90-day ED visits, readmissions, and reoperations. We retrospectively reviewed 1,724 consecutive risk stratified patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA. The mean age was 64.8 years and average body mass index (BMI) was 34.2 kg/m2. All patients underwent preoperative optimization using the RST. We first compared our primary variables of interest between obese (BMI>30, n=1,189) and non-obese patients (n=535). Patients were then divided into 3 groups (I-non-obese, II-obese (30–39.9 kg/m2) and III-morbidly obese ((>40 kg/m2)) and logistic regression was used to evaluate outcomes among the groups adjusted for age, sex, smoking history and diabetes.Introduction
Methods
The obesity epidemic is a growing problem and must be considered with the projected increased demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previous studies have reported increased complication rates after THA in the obese population, which has led to hesitation in offering surgery to this population. Moreover, some insurers are denying coverage for morbidly obese patients. While many consider obesity a “modifiable” risk factor, very few patients with advanced osteoarthritis have successfully lost substantial weight. The experience of centers that utilize systematic preoperative risk stratification tools and standardized postoperative total joint pathways may be underrepresented in prior studies. The aim of this study is to describe one surgeon's experience performing THA in morbidly and super-obese patient populations using an institutional preoperative Risk Stratification Tool (RST) and total joints pathway. We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing primary THA between May 2014 and December 2017 performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary care referral center. All patients were assessed preoperatively using an institutional RST and had a minimum of 90-day postoperative follow up. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI, kg/m2): non-obese (BMI < 30), obese (30–34), severely obese (35–39), morbidly obese (40–44), and super-obese (≥ 45). Primary outcomes were inpatient and 90-day complications. Continuous and binary parameters were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests. Logistic regression was additionally utilized to evaluate outcomes by BMI cohort.Introduction
Methods
The aim of this study was to examine GP’s and PT’s views of a physiotherapy led acute low back pain service Acute back pain sufferers develop chronic symptoms but early management may prevent chronicity (
GPs and PT’s eligible to use the service were sent a self-completed questionnaire. Response rate was 45% for GP’s and 69% for PT. Seventy-two percent of GP’s and 88% of PT’s were satisfied with the service. The majority of GP’s had copies of agreed guidelines (81%) and most were adhering to guidance on bedrest by not prescribing it (67%). Both professions found difficulty with patient expectations, demands for x-rays and treatment compliance. The majority of GP’s and PT’s were satisfied with a physiotherapy led back pain service. The difficulties experienced by both groups will form the basis of a training package for both professions .
