Preservation of acetabular bone during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is important, because proper stability of cementless acetabular cup during primary THA depends largely on the amount of bone stock left after acetabular reaming. Eccentric or excessive acetabular reaming can cause soft tissue impingement, loosening, altered centre of rotation, bone-to-bone impingement, intra-operative periprosthetic fracture, and other complications. Furthermore, loss of bone stock during primary THA may adversely affect subsequent revision THA. The purpose of this study was to compare preservation of acetabular bone stock between conventional THA (CTHA) vs. robotic-guided THA (RGTHA). We hypothesised that RGTHA would allow more precise reaming, leading to use of smaller cups and greater preservation of bone stock.Background
Questions/Purposes
Component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is critical to achieve optimal patient outcomes. Recent literature has shown acetabular component positioning may be inaccurate using traditional techniques. Robotic-assisted THA is a recent platform introduced to decrease the risk of malpositioned components. However, to date, a paucity of data is available comparing the intra-operative component position generated by the navigation system to post-operative radiographs. The purpose of this study was to compare the component position measurements of a navigation system, used during robotic-assisted THA, to component position measurements obtained on post-operative radiographs.Background
Purpose
Pre-operative and postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA) involves multimodal analgesia using differing classes of drugs and varying introductions of these agents. Postoperative opioid-related events can slow recovery and increase patients' length of stay. Long-acting local anesthetics can reduce early postoperative pain at the surgical site, potentiating a decrease of opioid intervention needed postoperatively. Decreasing opioid use while maintaining adequate pain control could reduce opioid-related events, increase patient time to first ambulation and decrease length of stay. The purpose of this study was to compare liposomal bupivacaine to bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia. Between November 2012 and February 2013, 57 consecutive patients that underwent THA and hip resurfacing received either an intraoperative injection of liposomal bupivacaine or bupivacaine alone. All patients received a combination of medications prior to the procedure including celecoxib 400 mg by mouth, pregabalin 75 mg by mouth and 1gm of intravenous acetaminophen. The study group received 20 cc of liposomal bupivacaine, combined with 40 cc 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine and 20 cc of normal saline. The control group received 60 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine. Data was prospectively collected including average visual analog pain scale (VAS), opioid consumption, time to first ambulation, hospital length of stay measured by days, and post-operative opioid-related adverse drug events.Background
Methods
Several recent reports have documented high frequency of malpositioned acetabular components, even amongst high volume arthroplasty surgeons. Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) has the potential to improve component positioning; however, to our knowledge there are no reports examining the learning curve during the adoption of robotic assisted THA. The purpose of this study was to examine the learning curve of robotic assisted THA as measured by component position, operative time, intra-operative technical problems, and complications.Background
Purpose
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been proven to be successful in achieving adequate pain relief and favorable outcomes in patients suffering from hip osteoarthritis (OA). However, leg length discrepancy (LLD) is still a significant cause of morbidities such as nerve damage, low back pain and abnormal gait. Despite most of the reported values of LLD in the literature being within the acceptable threshold of < 10 mm, some patients still report dissatisfaction, leading to litigation against orthopedic surgeons. However, lower extremity lengthening is sometimes necessary to achieve adequate hip joint stability and prevent dislocations. The purpose of this study was to compare LLD in patients undergoing THA using three different techniques: conventional anterior-approach THA (ATHA), conventional posterior-approach THA (PTHA), and robotic-assisted posterior-approach THA (RTHA) using the MAKO™ robotic hip system. All cases of RTHA, ATHA and PTHA that were performed by the senior surgeon between Sep 2008 and Dec 2012 were reviewed. Patients included in this study had a primary diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis, with available and proper post-operative antero-posterior pelvis radiographs. All radiographs were calibrated and measurements done twice by two blinded observers.Background:
Materials and Methods:
Acetabular cup positioning1, 2, leg length discrepancy3 and global offset4 are important parameters associated with outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Deviation from an accepted range of values for each of these parameters can lead to significant complications including nerve injury, low back pain, abnormal gait, increased dislocation rate, and bearing surface wear. The primary purpose of this study was to assess whether the use of the MAKO™ robotic hip system is reliable in predicting post-operative radiographic measurements of cup inclination, cup anteversion, leg length change, and global offset change in THA. All robotic-assisted THAs performed using the MAKO™ system between June 2011 and Dec 2012 were reviewed. A single surgeon performed all cases through a mini-posterior approach. The intra-operative measurements of cup inclination and anteversion angles, leg length change, and global offset change recorded by the MAKO™ system were compared to the post-operative radiographic measurements.Background:
Materials and Methods:
