Survival rates of recent total ankle replacement (TAR) designs are lower than those of other arthroplasty prostheses. Loosening is the primary indication for TAR revisions [NJR, 2014], leading to a complex arthrodesis often involving both the talocrural and subtalar joints. Loosening is often attributed to early implant micromotion, which impedes osseointegration at the bone-implant interface, thereby hampering fixation [Soballe, 1993]. Micromotion of TAR prostheses has been assessed to evaluate the stability of the bone-implant interface by means of biomechanical testing [McInnes The geometry of the tibial and talar components of three TAR designs widely used in Europe (BOX®, Mobility® and SALTO®; NJR, 2014) was reverse-engineered, and models of the tibia and talus were generated from CT data. Virtual implantations were performed and verified by a surgeon specialised in ankle surgery. In addition to the aligned case, misalignment was simulated by positioning the talar components in 5° of dorsi- or plantar-flexion, and the tibial components in ± 5° and 10° varus/valgus and 5° and 10° dorsiflexion; tibial dorsiflexed misalignement was combined with 5° posterior gap to simulate this misalignment case. Finite element models were then developed to explore bone-implant micromotion and loads occurring in the bone in the implant vicinity.Introduction
Methods
