Please check your email for the verification action. You may continue to use the site and you are now logged in, but you will not be able to return to the site in future until you confirm your email address.
Aims: To assess shoulder function and pain following open reduction and internal fixation of displaced 2, 3 &
4 part fractures of the proximal humerus, using a new fixation plate designed to provide rotation and angle stability.
Method: Patients treated by open reduction and internal fixation with a PlantTan Plate (PTP) were followed-up for a minimum period of 12 months from time of surgery. Post-operatively Constant-Murley (CMS) and visual analogue (VAS) scoring systems were used to assess function and pain at 2, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Complications have been recorded.
Results: 48 patients have been treated by 4 surgeons with a PTP. Mean patient age was 65 (32 – 89), 17 male, 31 female. Six operations were undertaken for non-union and 42 for acute fractures. At 12 months the mean CMS was 70 (19 – 95) for the fractured side compared to 86 (75 – 100) for the uninjured side, with a mean VAS of 20 (0–68). Six patients have died (unrelated causes). Screws have cut out in 6 (12.5%) patients with 1 requiring implant removal, 1 requiring revision and 1 requiring removal of a head screw. One screw cut out was due to the only case of AVN to date. There have been 5 (10.4%) superficial wound infections (resolved with oral antibiotics) and no deep infections. One patient had a postoperative CVA and one case developed a compartment syndrome due to intra-operative vascular injury; treated successfully with fasciotomies and vascular repair.
Conclusion: We believe the PTP is a useful implant for the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures. We will report on a minimum 2 year follow-up in the near future.
Aims: To prospectively compare the progress and outcomes during a follow-up period of two years in patients who were in the ‘freezing phase’ of Primary (Idiopathic) Frozen Shoulder following either manipulation of the shoulder under general anaesthetic (MUA) or intra-articular shoulder joint distension injections using steroid and local anaesthetic.
Methods: 53 consecutive patients aged between 40 and 75 years with Frozen Shoulder were randomised to receive either MUA followed by out-patient physiotherapy or up to 3 distension injections at six weekly intervals in the first 12 weeks. Outcomes were measured using Constant-Murley Shoulder Function Assessment Score (CS), Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain level, and the SF-36 Health Evaluation Questionnaire. All patients were reviewed at 2, 6 and12 weeks, then at 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. At each visit the CS and the VAS were repeated. The SF-36 was undertaken at initial and final visits.
Results: Group 1 (MUA) contained 28 patients of which 15 (54%) were female. Group 2 (Distension Injection) contained 25 patients of which 20 (80%) were female. No statistical difference was identified between the 2 groups in terms of outcome for the affected shoulders, for the SF36 scores, CS and the VAS. Maximum benefit was seen by 12 weeks in both groups. In group 2 this equated to 2 distension injections. No complications were noted in either group.
Conclusion: Frozen Shoulder is accepted to be a self-limiting condition with resolution by 2 years from onset. Any treatment aims to reduce this period of pain and disability. The potential risks of MUA include fracture and rotator cuff ruptures are well documented in the literature. Distension injections are easily performed in clinic without the need for admission, a general anaesthetic, or the risk of the complications associated with MUA. In view of there being no difference between the treatment modalities we recommend the use of 2 distension injections as the first line treatment for Frozen Shoulder.