The different types of treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head have not led to a consensus about which treatment is best for the different stages. Particularly in the later stages of osteonecrosis, the disease still progresses to destruction of the femoral dome. The purpose of our study was to check the outcome of bone impaction grafting used for the head-preserving treatment of severe femoral head osteonecrosis. In order to preserve the femoral head, the sphericity and mechanical properties of the femoral dome must be contained and further collapse prevented. In this prospective study, we included 28 hips in 27 patients who had severe complaints of pain due to an extensive osteonecrotic lesion. The mean age of the patients was 33 years with a mean follow up time of 42 months.Introduction
Methods
Radiologically, none of these 16 cups was loose. However, two of the cups migrated more than 5 mm (e.g. 6 and 8 mm) relative to the initial post-operative X-ray. At review, both patients were symptom free. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the cup with endpoint revision for any reason was 100% at ten years and 80% (95% CI, 62–98%) after 15 years; with endpoint cup revision for aseptic loosening the survival was 100% both at 10 and 15 years.
It has been generally accepted that dynamic mechanical load is important for normal bone physiology, remodeling and fracture healing. Impacted morsellized grafts can be seen as healing of many small fractured bone parts, involving bone remodelling, apposition and formation of new bone. Therefore load may be stimulative for the incorporation of this type of graft. In a pilot study we observed a positive effect of load on the density of incorporated bone after 12 weeks. Based on these results we hypothesised that physiological loading has a stimulatory effect on the early stage of bone graft incorporation. To test this idea we implanted fresh frozen allograft bone chips in 12 goats and loaded these grafts with the newly developed subcutaneous pressure implant (
Bone mineral density was not affected by load. Histology revealed microscopic evidence of normal bone graft incorporation as seen in previous studies. The amount of active incorporating bone was higher under load (p<
0.05). The formation of a new bony structure was not affected by load in this early stage of bone graft incorporation. However, load resulted in a more active graft incorporation after 5 weeks. The difference between the loaded and non-loaded group might be partially obscured by a low level of physiological loading in the non-loaded group induced by the daily activity of the animals.