Exercise is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). Interestingly, content and dose of exercise interventions seem to be important for the effect of exercise interventions, but the optimal content and dose is unknown. This warrants randomized controlled trials providing evidence for the optimal exercise program in Hip OA. The aim of this trial was to investigate whether progressive resistance training (PRT) is superior to neuromuscular exercise (NEMEX) for improving functional performance, hip pain and hip-related quality of life in patients with hip OA. This was a multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, superiority trial. 160 participants with clinically diagnosed hip OA were recruited from hospitals and physiotherapy clinics and randomly assigned to twelve weeks of PRT or NEMEX. The PRT intervention consisted of 5 high-intensity resistance training exercises targeting muscles at the hip and knee joints. The NEMEX intervention included 10 exercises and emphasized sensorimotor control and functional stability. The primary outcome was change in the 30-second chair stand test (30s-CST). Key secondary outcomes were changes in scores on the pain and hip-related quality of life (QoL) subscales of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS).Introduction
Method
Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in the quadriceps is frequent in runners finishing a marathon race, and may result in several days of discomfort and pain. There is an increasing clinical evidence that noninvasive, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) can have physiological effect on inflammation and tissue repair. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of PEMF on quadriceps muscle soreness in marathon runners and to use the data to calculate an appropriate sample size for a subsequent study. The design was a randomized double-blind prospective study covering a 5 days period after completion of a beach marathon. After the marathon all 74 runners that completed the 42.195 km were asked to participate in the study. Forty-six agreed to enter the study and were block randomized into an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group received an active pulsed electromagnetic field device, and the control group received a sham device. The sham devices were used in exactly the same manner but produced no electromagnetic field. The active PEMF device does not produce heat or cause any sensation in the tissue allowing participants to be blinded to treatment. The pulsed electromagnetic field signals of a 2-msec burst of 27.12-MHz sinusoidal waves were repeated at two bursts per second. Peak magnetic field was 0.05 G, which induced an average electric field of 10 mV/cm in the tissue with an effect of 7.3 mW/cm3. All subjects were instructed to place the device on the most painful area of the quadriceps for 20 minutes four times a day. Pain intensity was measured three times a day with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during a 90o squat with a self-administered questionnaire. Data were non-parametric and compared with a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test.Introduction
Material and methods
