Improvised Explosive Device (IED) attacks on vehicles have been a significant feature of recent conflicts. The Dynamic Response Index (DRI), developed for predicting spinal injury in aircraft ejection, has been adopted for testing vehicles in underbelly blast. Recent papers suggest that DRI is not accurate in blast conditions. We suggest that the distribution of blast and ejection injuries is different. A literature review identified the distribution of spinal fractures in aircraft ejection incidents. A Joint Theatre Trauma Registry search identified victims of mounted IED blast with spinal fractures. The distribution of injuries in the two groups was compared using the Kruskall Wallis test. 329 fractures were identified in ejector seat incidents; 1% cervical, 84% thoracic and 16% lumbar. 245 fractures were identified in victims of mounted blast; 16% cervical, 34% thoracic and 50% lumbar. There was no significant similarity between the two (p=1). There was no statistically significant difference between the distribution of fractures in blast survivors versus fatalities. The difference between blast and ejection injury patterns suggests that injury prediction models for ejection should not be extrapolated to blast mechanisms and that new models need to be developed.
Recent evidence suggests that both the accepted mechanism of blast-mediated traumatic amputation (TA) (shockwave then blast wind exposure) and the link with fatal shockwave exposure merit review. Searching UK military prospectively gathered trauma registry data and post mortem CT (PM-CT) records identified casualties from August 2008 to August 2010 with blast-mediated TAs. TA level and associated injuries were recorded. Data on pre-debridement osseous and soft tissue injuries were only consistently available for fatalities through PM-CT imaging. 146 Cases (75 survivors and 71 fatalities) with 271 TAs (130 in survivors and 141 in fatalities) were identified. Through-joint TA rate in fatalities was 34/141 (24.1%). PM-CT analysis demonstrated only 9/34 through joint TAs with contiguous fractures in the immediately proximal long bone/limb girdle. 18/34 had no fracture, and 7/34 had a non-contiguous fracture. The previously reported link between TA and blast lung injury was not present, calling into question the significance of shockwaves in generating blast-mediated TAs. Furthermore, contemporary blast injury theory cannot account for the high prevalence of through joint TAs (previously published rate 1.3%). The proportion of through joint TAs with no associated fracture or a non-contiguous fracture (74%) is supportive of pure flail as a mechanism for blast-mediated TA.
Traumatic amputations (TAs) are amongst the most significant orthopaedic sequelae following IED strikes. Biomechanically, longer residual limb length confers better function. However, post-trauma definitive through knee amputation (TKA) remains controversial. UK military casualties sustaining ≥1 major TA, 01/08/2008–01/08/2010 were identified using the UK JTTR and post mortem CT databases. All through- and below-knee TAs were termed ‘potential TKAs’ (p-TKAs); hypothetical candidates for definitive TKA. We hypothesised that traumatic TKAs were more common than previously reported (4.5% of lower limb TAs) and a significant cohort of blast injuries exist suitable for definitive TKA. 146 cases (75 survivors, 71 fatalities) sustained 271 TAs (235 lower limb). TKA rate was 34/235 (14.2%). 63/130 survivor TAs and 66/140 fatality TAs merited analysis as p-TKAs. Detailed pathoanatomy was only available for fatality p-TKAs, for whom definitive TKA would have been proximal to the zone of injury (ZOI) in only 3/66 cases. Blast-mediated traumatic TKAs are significantly more common than previously reported (
The accepted mechanism of traumatic limb amputation following blast is initial bone disruption due to the shock wave, with amputation completed by the blast wind; survival is considered unlikely. The high survival rate of traumatic amputees following explosion, from the current conflict in Afghanistan, is at odds with previous work. We reviewed extremity injuries, sustained in Afghanistan by UK military personnel, over a 2 year period. 774 British servicemen and women sustained AIS >1 injuries, 72.6% of whom survived. No significant difference was found in the survival rates following explosive blast or gunshot (p>0.05). 169 casualties (21.8%) sustained 263 lower limb and 74 upper limb traumatic amputations. Amputations were more common in the lower than the upper limbs and more common in the extremity proximal bone. Bilateral lower limb amputations were more common than a unilateral lower limb amputation. The majority (99%) of major amputations were sustained as a result of explosion. 46.3% (74) of those who sustained a major amputation following explosion survived. Rates of fatalities caused by explosion, or by small arms are not statistically different. Blast-mediated amputations are not universally fatal, and a significant number were through joint, calling into question previously proposed mechanisms.
Recent advances in combat casualty care have enabled survival following battlefield injuries that would have been lethal in past conflicts. While some injuries remain beyond our current capability to treat, they have the potential to be future ‘unexpected’ survivors. The greatest threat to deployed coalition troops currently and for the foreseeable future is the improvised explosive device (IED) Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct an analysis of causes of death and injury patterns in recent explosive blast fatalities in order to focus research and mitigation strategies, to further improve survival rates. Since November 2007, UK Armed Forces personnel killed whilst deployed on combat operations undergo both a post mortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan and an autopsy. With the permission of the coroners, we analysed casualties with PMCTs between November 2007 and July 2010. Injury data were analysed by a pathology-forensic radiology-orthopaedic multidisciplinary team. Cause of death was attributed to the injuries with the highest AIS scores contributing to the NISS score. Injuries with an AIS < 4 were excluded. During the study period 227 PMCT scans were performed; 211 were suitable for inclusion, containing 145 fatalities due to explosive blast from IEDs. These formed the study group. 24 cases had such severe injuries (disruptions) that further study was inappropriate. Of the remaining 121, 79 were dismounted, and 42 were mounted (in vehicles). Leading causes of death were head CNS injury (47.6%), followed by intra-cavity haemorrhage (21.7%) in the mounted group, and extremity haemorrhage (42.6%), junctional haemorrhage (22.2%) and head CNS injury (18.7%) in the dismounted group. The severity of head trauma in both mounted and dismounted IED fatalites would indicate that prevention and mitigation of these injuries is likely to be the most effective strategy to decrease their resultant mortality. Two thirds of dismounted fatalities have haemorrhage implicated as a cause of death that may have been amenable to prehospital treatment strategies. One fifth of mounted fatalites have haemorrhagic trauma which currently could only be addressed surgically. Maintaining the drive to improve all haemostatic techniques for combat casualties from point of wounding to definitive surgical proximal control alongside development and application of novel haemostatics could yield a significant survival benefit.
The mechanism of traumatic amputation (TA) from explosive blast has traditionally been considered to be a combination of blast wave induced bone injury – primary blast - followed by limb avulsion from the blast wind – tertiary blast. This results in a transosseous TA, with through joint amputations considered to be extremely rare. Data from previous conflicts has also suggested that this injury is frequently associated with a non-survivable primary blast lung injury (PBLI), further linking the extremity injury to the primary blast wave. However, our current experience in the Middle East would suggest that both the mechanism of TA and the link with fatal primary blast exposure need to be reconsidered. The aim of this study was to analyse the injury profile of the current cohort of TA fatalities to further investigate the underlying blast injury mechanism and to allow hypotheses on injury mechanisms to be developed for further analysis. With the permission of the coroners, 121 post-mortem CT (PMCT) scans of UK Armed Forces personnel who died following an IED blast were analysed. All orthopaedic injuries were identified, classified and the anatomical level of any associated soft tissue injury noted. PMCT evidence of PBLI was used as a marker of significant primary blast exposure. 75/121 (62%) sustained at least 1 TA, with 138 TAs seen in total. 31/138 (22%) were through joints, with through knee amputations most common (23/31, 74%). Only 7/31(23%) through joint amputations had an associated fracture proximal to and contiguous with the amputation site. The soft tissue injury profile of through joint and transosseous TAs were not significantly different (p=0.569). When fatality location was considered (i.e. mounted or dismounted), no overall relationship between PBLI and TA was evident. The two pathologies were not seen to consistently occur concurrently, as has been previously reported. The accepted mechanism for traumatic amputation following explosive blast does not adequately explain the significant number of through joint TAs presented here. The previously reported link between TA and PBLI in fatalities was not supported by this analysis of modern combat blast fatalities. Lack of an associated fracture with the majority of through joint TAs in conjunction with a lesser contribution of primary blast may implicate flail and periarticular soft tissue failure as a potential injury mechanism. Analysis of through joint TA incidence and associated injuries in survivors is now indicated. Case studies within the fatality dataset may facilitate generation of injury mechanism hypotheses. To further investigate the injury mechanism, work is required to understand osseous, ligamentous and other soft tissue behaviour and failure at high strain rates. This should allow characterisation and modeling of these injuries and inform mitigation strategies.
Counter-insurgency warfare in recent military operations has been epitomised by the use of Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) against coalition troops. Emerging patterns of skeletal fractures, limb amputations and organ injuries, which are caused by these weapons have been described over recent years. This paper describes a retrospective case series of knee dislocations caused by IEDs in recent conflict. Data was obtained about military personnel from 2006 to 2011, who had sustained a knee dislocation while serving in Afghanistan from a prospectively gathered database, the Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR), maintained by the Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine. The diagnosis of knee dislocation and its associated skeletal injuries was assessed by review of all relevant plain radiographs, computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance images. The mechanism of injury, incidence of vascular injuries and other skeletal injuries was recorded. During the study period, 23 casualties sustained a knee dislocation caused by an IED. Four casualties had an associated popliteal vascular injury. Eleven injuries were caused in enclosed spaces, and 10 injuries caused by IEDs out in the open. Anterior dislocations were common in the group caused in enclosed spaces. 19/20 patients had at least one other skeletal fracture. Knee dislocations represent an uncommon but important diagnosis in modern warfare. Urgent and careful assessment for any associated vascular injuries or other skeletal injuries may help ensure timely treatment and promote future recovery. Mitigation against knee dislocation may be possible in the enclosed environment because of the predictable pattern of injury.
Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is an increasingly diagnosed cause of hip pain in young patients. It may progress to cause labral injury and chondral damage within the hip. Surgery can be undertaken arthroscopically but is not universally available. Open approach to the hip with surgical dislocation, labral surgery and impingement lesion reduction is an acceptable alternative. Described by Ganz in 2001 the approach must conserve the postero-lateral blood supply to the femoral head and neck, to minimize the risk of Avascular Necrosis (AVN). Ganz recommended a sliding trochanteric osteotomy to widen access, and an anterior capsulotomy avoiding dissection postero-lateral to the femoral neck. To date there has been no published support for the Hardinge-type antero-lateral approach. We describe a series of 26 consecutive patients with FAI, all managed by open osteochondroplasty during 2008 via a modified anterolateral approach and capsule preserving exposure. Trochanteric osteotomy was not undertaken. The series contained 14 males and 12 females with mean ages of 33 and 29 respectively. Patients were assessed both clinically and using the Non Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS). Assessments were undertaken pre-operatively and at 8 and 16 weeks post-operatively. The mean NAHS pre-op was 54. This improved to 87 at 16 weeks. 77% of our patients achieved a NAHS of 75 or greater indicating a good or excellent result. Three patients had poor outcome and progression of osteoarthritic symptoms. There were no complications from the osteochondroplasty and all patients were Trendelenberg negative by 16 weeks. We believe hip osteochondroplasty can be safely and effectively undertaken via an anterolateral approach, without a trochanteric osteotomy.
