Durable fixation may be difficult to achieve when significant bone loss is present, as it occurs in pelvic sarcoma resection and revision surgery of tumor implants. Purpose of this study was to review clinical results of primary and revision surgery of the pelvis and lower extremity in the setting of severe bone loss following limb salvage procedures for bone sarcoma using modular porous tantalum implants. Retrospective study of 15 patients (nine females, six males) undergoing primary or revision pelvic reconstruction (five patients) or revision surgery of a tumor implant of the hip (five patients), knee (four patients), and ankle (one patient) using porous tantalum implants was undertaken. Reason for the tumor implant was resection of bone sarcoma in 13 cases and tumor-like massive bone loss in the remaining two cases. Cause for revision was aseptic failure (nine patients) or deep infection (six patients); average age at the time of surgery was 31 years (16–61 yrs). Revision was managed in a staged fashion in all the six infected cases. All patients presented severe combined segmental and cavitary bone defects. Bone loss was managed in all patients using porous tantalum implants as augmentation of residual bone stock and associated with a megaprosthesis in eight cases (five proximal femur, two distal femur, one proximal tibia). Average follow-up was 4.5 years for hip/knee implants and 2.5 yrs for pelvic reconstructions (range 1–6.8 yrs). Minimum follow-up of two years was available in 11 cases.Purpose
Method
The consequences of infection in orthopedic oncology patients are well known. Methicillin sensitive- and resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA, respectively) are common infecting organisms which may colonize patients pre-operatively. The prevalence of colonization in orthopedic oncology patients is unknown. We sought to prospectively establish the prevalence of MSSA and MRSA colonization in an orthopedic oncology patient population. Beginning in September 2009, all oncology patients of a single surgical service were prospectively screened pre-operatively for MSSA and MRSA colonization using PCR nasal swabs as part of an infection control protocol. Patients identified as carriers underwent decolonization treatment peri-operatively.Purpose
Method
Curative treatment of malignancies in the sacrum and lumbar spine frequently requires en-bloc spinopelvic resection. There is no standard classification of these procedures. We present a classification of these resections based on analysis of 45 consecutive cases of oncologic spinopelvic resections. This classification implies a surgical approach, staging algorithm, bony and soft tissue reconstruction, and functional outcomes following surgery. We reviewed oncologic staging, surgical resections, and reconstructions of 45 consecutive patients undergoing spinopelvic resection with curative intent. Mean follow-up of surviving patients was 38 months. Common themes in these cases were identified to formulate the surgical classification.Purpose
Method
We report a series of sixteen total hip arthroplasties utilizing a porous tantalum trabecular metal acetabular component in patients with tumors of the hip. The study included eight men and eight women with an average age of 59.3 (range 22–80 years). Two patients had benign but locally recurrent disease destructive of bone (Langerhan’s Cell Histiocytosis and Rosi Dorfman Disease), while fourteen had malignant lesions. The latter included six myeloma, two lymphoma, and six metastatic carcinoma (three breast, one prostate, one lung, and one unknown site). Fifteen patients had prior radiation therapy. The technique used was determined by the extent of the lesion and the quality of remaining host bone. In eight patients major deficiencies necessitated augmentation of the porous tantalum cup with an anti-protrusio device “over -the top” a cup-cage construct. Porous tantalum augments were utilised with the cup to fill defects in the acetabulum in seven patients. Postoperative complications were seen in four cases (DVT, DIC, pneumonia, and one death from c. difficile colitis). Postoperatively, the majority of the patients had excellent pain relief and improved ambulatory status. No clinical failures have been observed at follow-up (mean 12.5 months, range twenty days-twenty-eight months). There have been no re-operations. Radiographically, no migration or evidence of implant loosening has been observed.
The influence of advancements in imaging and chemotherapy on patient with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma was determined. There were forty-two cases in which twenty-seven patients received adjuvant therapy. Median survival was eight months and five-year survival was 4.8%. There was no statistical difference (p=0.62) in survival between patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy, had wide versus radical resection, or had limb sparing versus sacrificing procedures. There were no statistically significant differences between patients treated prior to 1986 and those subsequently. Despite advances, dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma continues to carry a poor prognosis. The routine adjuvant chemotherapy in this population should be questioned The long-term survival for patients that presented with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma has historically been poor. A large clinical series has not been analyzed in the era of modern diagnostic and treatment modalities. The current study was performed to look at the influence of advancements in imaging and chemotherapy on patient outcome. A retrospective chart review of all cases of patients presenting with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma at our institution from 1984–2000 was performed. This was done as an extension to a study published in 1986 prior to the era of modern chemotherapy. There were forty-two cases in twenty-five men and seventeen women of average age fifty-six (range twenty-four-eighty-three years). MSTS grades at presentation were IIA(5), IIB(27), and III(10). Three patients underwent biopsy only, nineteen had limb sacrificing surgery, and twenty had limb sparing procedures. Surgical margins were intralesional in three, marginal in two, wide in twenty, and radical in fourteen. Twenty-seven patients received adjuvant therapy (twenty-two chemotherapy only, two radiotherapy only, three combined therapy). Median survival was eight months and five-year survival was 4.8%. There was no statistical difference (p=0.62) in survival between patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy, had wide versus radical resection, or had limb sparing versus sacrificing procedures. There were no statistically significant differences between patients treated prior to 1986 and those subsequently. Despite advances in diagnostic modalities, surgical treatments, and adjuvant therapies, dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma continues to carry a poor prognosis. The routine use of current adjuvant chemotherapy and its inherent risks and benefits in this population should be questioned.