To compare the post-operative morbidity, of a novel vertical approach, with that of the standard transverse one, for procurement of Autologous bone graft from the iliac crest, for the purpose of cervical spine fusions. Eighty patients undergoing procurement of bone graft from the iliac crest were prospectively randomised into two groups. The study group (36) underwent the procedure through a novel vertical approach, while the controls (44) had the standard transverse approach. Both groups were evaluated by a blinded observer at 1 month and 6 months post-operatively. The visual analogue pain score, (VAS), use of analgesics, disruption of cutaneous nerve function and local tenderness were recorded.Purpose
Methodology
A prospective study on the management of 23 patients with complex high energy tibial fractures was carried out to assess the outcome following the use of different external fixators. They were all followed up clinically and radio logically till fracture union. The average age 42 years (range 13–77 years) 17 male &
6 females. Fourteen were closed and 9 open. Eight were falls from height, 9 RTAs, one crush injury and one assault. All of the open fractures were grade 3. Six patients had proximal tibial fractures (one Schatzker Type-II, one Type-IV, two Type-V and two Type-VI) They united at an average of 20 weeks (range 10–40 weeks). Seven were Shaft fractures average duration to union 30 weeks (range 8–104 weeks), and eight were Pilon fractures (Two Ruedi &
Allgower Type-II &
Six Type-III) they united at an average duration of 13 weeks (range 7–20 weeks) All patients achieved clinical and radiological union at a mean duration of 22 weeks. Sheffield Ring fixator [SRF] was used primarily in 11 patients, none failed. Two had initial monolateral fixators which were converted to SRF. Two were managed with Illizarov frames and three with hybrid fixators. Seven patients had an initial monolateral fixator, two failed and were converted to a Sheffield fixator, 2 planned conversion to an intramedullary nail, one developed a delayed union and was converted to a Sheffield fixator, only two continued till union. Nine patients developed pin tract infection needing Antibiotics, three of them developed Osteomyelitis, Four had failure of fixation needing a second operation. Two developed malunion, one managed with total knee replacement, another required Ankle fusion. The average SF 12 score for the Sheffield group PCS was 52.1 and MCS of 51.7. For the Monolateral fixator group PCS was 47.2 and MCS of 48.1. For the Hybrid fixator group PCS of 34.7 and MCS of 42.7 and for the Ilizarov group PCS was 39.85 and MCS was 55.05. In this cohort of complicated High energy Tibial fractures, those managed with Circular Frames especially SCF augmented with interfragmantary screws proved to be most successful with a very lower failure rate and better patient satisfaction.
The 2007 National Institute for health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) thromboprophylaxis guidelines concerning hip arthroplasty remain contentious. A survey among British Hip Society members was performed to investigate the impact of these guidelines. Information on thromboprophylactic measures before and after guideline publication was gathered in the three categories of Total Hip Replacement (THR), hip fracture and high-risk patients as defined by NICE. The response rate was 185/250 (74%). All responders used thromboprophylaxis, but only 44%, 22% and 7% indicated they were currently acting in accordance with guidance for THR, high risk and hip fracture groups respectively. 19%, 14% and 14% had changed their practice since publication of the guidance in THR, high risk and hip fracture groups respectively. The effects of the NICE guidance in influencing the responders’ thromboprophylactic protocols have been very limited. These results do not appear to endorse the authority of NICE in decisions made in this area.
The mean follow-up for the MIS THA group was 22.9 months compared to 33.1 months for the conventional THA group. All our MIS patients had less postoperative blood loss, needed less post operative painkillers, and mobilised earlier. There was however no significant difference in the duration of postoperative hospital stay between the two patient groups. We have had no incidence of dislocation and continue to use this technique during routine THA.