Since 1977 we did implant ceramic on ceramic THR in younger and active population. In 1991 we published (JBJS B N°4) data's in a consecutive group of patients under 50 years of age.

What about the same patients for more than 30 years? Eighty-six hips in 75 patients, 41 males 34 females, mean age 43 (18 to 50), mean weight 68 kg (36 to 100), Charnley class: 38 A, 28 (38 hips) B, 9 patients (10 hips) C. Sixty-six primary procedures, 20 revisions (18 failed arthroplasties: 6 THR, 5 resurfacing, four single cup, two hemiarthroplasty, one bipolar), one after acetabular fractures. Four hips previously infected.

Eight Patients deceased (8 hips) prosthesis still in place, ten lost to follow-up before 2 years, eight hips in 8 patients were revised before the review, partially followed: from 2 to 20 years: 35, completely followed: 25 hips in 23 patients resuming in: No pain in 20, slight pain in 2, severe disability in 3 not related to the hip, no radiolucent lines in 22, radiolucent lines in 3, no osteolysis in 25.

Revision for: early sepsis in one, socket loosening in 8 (3 revisions cases), femoral head fractures in 2: one extra small head (22mm) for Crowe 3 DDH, one fractured at 24 years.

Inertness, stability related to fibrous tissue generation, no noise.

Fracture risks are the most common argument against the use of Ceramic on ceramic (CoC) hip implants. Question: is ceramic material at risk in case of severe local trauma?

Over a long period, we tried to identify patients with a CoC prosthesis (Ceraver Osteal°)who did sustain a trauma. This was conducted in three different institutions.

Eleven patients were found: 9 males and 2 females aged 17 to 70 years at time of index surgery. Accident occurred 6 months to 15 years after index: one car accident, five motorcycle accident, five significant trauma after a fall, including one ski board accident. Consequences of these trauma were: six fractures of the acetabulum with socket loosening in 4 that needed revision, two femoral shaft fracture, one orifed and one stem exchanged, one traumatic hip dislocation associated to loosening of the socket revised at 10 years, and one traumatic loosening of the socket. Ten had no consequence on ceramic integrity. One experienced a fracture of the patella from a dashboard trauma, a liner shipping was discovered during socket revision 2 years later. This is the only case of possible relation between trauma and ceramic fracture. In a more recent longitudinal study on 1856 CoC prosthesis performed from 2010 to 2021, 29 severe traumas were identified with no consequence on Ceramic material.

From this limited case study, it can be assumed that Pure Alumina Ceramic well designed and manufactured, will not break after a significant trauma.

Different pathologies, deformities, bone defects, previous surgeries and polyethylene wear limit the survival of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients. We compare preoperative status and outcome in 171 young and very young patients (207 hips) who underwent a ceramic-on-ceramic THA. Sixty-three (77 hips) were less than 30 years old (group 1) and 108 (130) were between 30 and 40 years old. Mean follow-up was 11.3 years. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures were used to analyse clinical and radiological changes.

Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) was the most frequent diagnosis in group 1 and avascular necrosis in group 2. Charnley class type C, low activivity, previous surgery and osteoporotic bone were more frequent in group 1 patients. There were 2 cup revisions for aseptic loosening in group 1 and 4 in group 2. Survivorship analysis at 15 years was 96.7% (95% IC 92.2 a 100) for group 1 and 96.1% (95% IC 92.2 to 100) for group 2 (p=0.749). Despite the worse preoperative status in group 1 patients, clinical outcome was similar in both groups. Severe dysplasia had the worst clinical result and avascular necrosis the best. Patients with Charnley class C and JRA showed the most improvement. Radiographic reconstruction of the abduction angle was worse in group 1 (p=0.02). No osteolysis or complications derived from ceramic use were found.

We conclude that despite the worse preoperative status in group 1 patients, clinical and radiographic results were good in both groups of patients who received a ceramic-on-ceramic THA.

Recent studies about hip stability after total hip arthroplasties (THA) concerned differences regarding bearings: ceramic on ceramic (CoC) presenting less dislocations on the long term compared to metal or ceramic on polyethylene. The hypothesis is a difference in the healing process of periarticular tissues, with a stronger fibrous tissue for the first one, and more foreign body reaction, joint effusion with the others.

NMR Imaging of the pelvis showing both hips using novel MR MAVRIC program for metal artefacts suppression, were performed in 10 patients, 15 THA and 2 non-pathological contralateral hips. Eight hips had CoC bearings, 3 of which were impacted cementless bulky ceramic implant, and 5 had a metal back. 7 hips had CoP bearings, 4 of which were cemented.

Native capsules showed a mean thickness of 6.6mm. For CoC bearings, capsule thickness ranged from 7mm to 9.6 mm with a mean thickness of 8mm. For CoP bearings, capsule thickness ranged from 3mm to 8.4mm, with a mean thickness of 6.1mm. Neocapsule appeared clearly in all COC bearings observed, while for CoP, sometimes it was less dense with fatty aspect, 3 hips out of 7 having a very thin capsule under 4mm.

It is possible to observe and quantify new capsule after THR and measure differences although not significant regarding bearings on limited number of samples. More patients might be included, but the tendencies observed here might explain better long term stability in vivo observed with Coc.