Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 152 - 152
1 Mar 2008
Forsythe M Lenczner E Nilssen E Burman M Marien R Schweitzer M Chatha D
Full Access

Purpose: Despite a number of recently published reports on the success of meniscal repair devices, there are no anatomic studies documenting their safety. The purpose of this cadaveric and radiographic study was to anatomically determine the proximity of a common commercially available meniscal repair device to the popliteal neurovascular structures

Methods: Five human cadaveric knees were obtained and procured from the medical school anatomy lab. Two Biostingers (Linvatec) measuring 16mm in length were placed in the posterior one third of the medial meniscus. Each specimen was then placed prone with the knee extended to expose the posterior aspect of the knee. The distance to the neurovascular bundle for each device was then measured with a ruler calibrated to the nearest 0.1cm. To validate our anatomic dissection results, fifty calibrated human knee MRI scans were reviewed by two independent radiologists. The distances measured were from the popliteal artery to the closest point at the lateral meniscus periphery/capsule and the medial meniscus periphery/capsule. The average distance as measured by the two radiologists was calculated as was the average for the entire population of fifty subjects

Results: The mean distance in the cadaveric study was 15.6mm (14.0–18.0mm) between the tip of the repair device needle and the neurovascular bundle. The mean distance on MRI from the popliteal neurovascular bundle to the closest point in the posterior medial meniscus was 20.0 mm (13.0 mm–28.7 mm). The mean distance from the popliteal structures to the posterior lateral meniscus was 9.4 mm (3.2 mm–16.5 mm).

Conclusions: Considering the potential for significant morbidity, we recommend medial meniscal repair should be performed carefully with repair devices. Specifically, one should limit posterior capsule penetrations to less than 15 mm based on these findings.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 388 - 388
1 Sep 2005
Danino B Shabshin N Schweitzer M Halperin N
Full Access

Introduction: MRI of the knee is routinely performed in supine position, without providing information about physiological weight bearing. Since erect knee MRIs can be performed in a double-donut MRI, we sought to compare supine and weight bearing knee MRIs of patients with and without osteoarthritis (OA).

Materials and Methods: On a 0.5T double-donut open MR 16 patients were studied in supine and erect: 10 with OA and 6 age matched asymptomatic patients.

The joint space, coronal and sagittal meniscal thickness, extrusion in 4 directions, meniscal angles, intermeniscal space and evaluation of menisci, ligaments and marrow were compared between positions in the OA and control groups. Correlation with medial knee pain was obtained.

Results: The average intermeniscal space was greater in OA and in the erect position. The joint space was narrower in OA especially in the medial compartment and in the supine position (p< 0.02). The mean meniscal thickness was similar in both positions and groups.

In OA the meniscal angle was larger when upright, without statistical significance.

The medial, lateral and anterior meniscal extrusion were greater in OA on vertical and supine, especially the anterior extrusion of medial meniscus which was significantly higher in OA (p= 0.0259, 0.0122, vertical, supine, respectively( and on vertical position (p= 0.0041).

Medial extrusion was higher in OA on both positions (p= 0.0228, 0.0184 vertical , supine).

Medial meniscal tears were seen in 6/10 OA and 2/6 controls. MCL grade 1 sprain pattern was seen in 4/10 OA, chronic ACL tear was seen in 5, and subchondral marrow edema in 8/10.

7/10 OA patients complained of knee pain which was predominantly medial.

Conclusions: Standing MRI shows relative widening of the joint, possibly due to the altered osseous alignment. Extrusion of the meniscus and intermeniscal space are more common in OA and under weight bearing. Medial meniscal extrusion correltaes with osteoarthritis and worsens under weight bearing. This may explain the common medial knee pain in osteoarthritis as seen in data from the orthopedic literature, as well as the clinical evaluation of our patients, and may be attributed to increased pressure on the capsule or MCL.