header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 370 - 370
1 Sep 2012
Schlegel U Siewe J Püschel K Gebert De Uhlenbrock A Eysel P Morlock M
Full Access

Despite proven advantages, pulsatile lavage seems to be used infrequently during preparation in cemented total knee arthroplasty. This remains irritating, as the technique has been suggested to improve radiological survival in cemented TKA, where aseptic loosening of the tibial component represents the main reason for revision. Furthermore, there may be a potential improvement of fixation strength for the tibial tray achieved by increased cement penetration. In this study, the influence of pulsed lavage on mechanical stability of the tibial component and bone cement penetration was analyzed in a cadaveric setting. Six pairs of cadaveric, proximal tibia specimen underwent computed tomography (CT) for assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) and exclusion of osseous lesions. Following surgical preparation, in one side of a pair, the tibial surface was irrigated using 1800ml normal saline and pulsatile lavage, while in the other side syringe lavage using the identical amount of fluid was applied. After careful drying, bone cement was hand-pressurized on the bone surface, tibial components were inserted and impacted in an identical way. After curing of cement, specimen underwent a postimplantation CT analysis). Cement distrubution was then assessed using a three-dimenionsional visualization software. Trabecular bone, cement and implant were segmented based on an automatic thresholding algorithm, which had been validated in a previous study. This allowed to determine median cement penetration for the entire cemented area. Furthermore, fixation strength of the tibial trays was determined by a vertical pull-out test using a servohydraulic material testing machine. Testing was performed under displacement control at a rate of 0,5mm/sec until implant failure. Data was described by median and range. Results were compared by a Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test with a type 1 error probability of 5 %. Median pull-out forces in the pulsed lavage group were 1275N (range 864–1391) and 568N (range 243–683) in the syringe lavage group (p=0.031). Cement penetration was likewise increased (p=0.031) in the pulsed lavage group (1.32mm; range 0.86–1.94), when compared to the syringe irrigated group (0.79mm; range 0.51–1.66). Failure occurred in the pulsatile lavage group at the implant-cement interface and in the syringe lavage group at the bone-cement interface, which indicates the weakness of the latter. Altogether, improved mechanical stability of the tibial implant and likewise increased bone cement interdigitation could be demonstrated in the current study, when pulsed lavage is implemented. Enhanced fixation strength was suggested being a key to improved survival of the implant. If this is the case, pulsatile lavage should be considered being a mandatory preparation step when cementing tibial components in TKA.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 87 - 87
1 Mar 2006
Aldinger P Gill H Rumolo C Schlegel U Murray D Breusch S
Full Access

Background: In anteromedial osteoarthritis, only the medial compartment of the knee is affected and the collateral ligaments as well as the cruciate mechanism are intact. These preconditions make the knee suitable for UKA. Our hypothesis was that no difference in tibiofemoral kinematics is observed after UKA. In addition we also hypothesised that the results of the image guided surgery would be the same as the normal surgical procedure.

Design/Methods: To test this hypothesis, we conducted a study using 13 normal human cadaveric knees. For kinematic analysis, the SurgeticsTM surgical navigation system (Praxim, France), equipped with custom written tracking software, was used. Reference markers were mounted to the proximal tibia and the distal femur. In a standardised set-up, the knee was positioned in a leg holder and preoperative kinematics of the normal knee was recorded after a para-patellar mini-incision . Joint kinematics were recorded during passive knee flexion and plotted against flexion angle. Oxford UKA was performed; the standard Phase III instrumentation was used for six knees and the image guided procedure was used for seven knees. After the operation postoperative kinematics were recorded using the same measurement protocol. All data were processed using Matlab 6.1 analysis software (The MathWorks Inc., MA, USA). Preoperative and postoperative tibiofemoral kinematics were determined and compared. The mechanical axes of the tibia and femur were determined and kinematics represented as functions of knee flexion range. Over both the flexing and extending cycles of the knee the changes in tibiofemoral rotation (ΔROT), tibiofemoral ab/adduction (ΔABD), and distances between the origins of the mechanical axes (ΔX, ΔY, ΔZ) were calculated between pre and post-operative states.

Results: The mean differences between pre- and postoperative kinematics for all cases are given as the mean and range in parentheses. For the flexing cycle was ΔROT −0.06 (6.08 to −3.93) degrees, ΔABD was −0.04 (3.39 to −5.72) degrees, ΔX was 0.69 (2.69 to −1.84) mm, ΔY was −0.22 (4.13 to −3.41) mm and was ΔZ 0.27 (4.09 to −1.47) mm. For the extending cycle was ΔROT 0.1 (5.87 to −3.61) degrees, ΔABD was −0.06 (5.72 to −5.95) degrees, ΔX was 0.35 (2.73 to −2.39) mm, ΔY was −0.39 (5.58 to −3.08) mm and was ΔZ 0.21 (3.77 to −1.12) mm. There were no observable differences between the standard and image guided changes in kinematics. Overall, no observable differences were found between pre and post-operative kinematics.

Conclusions: The image guidance system used in our study is a valuable tool for assessing pre- and postoperative knee kinematics. Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with the Phase III instrumentation in the presence of the cruciate mechanism reproduces the normal kinematics of the knee very accurately.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 245 - 245
1 Sep 2005
Kälicke T Schierholz J Schlegel U Printzen G Seybold D Köller M Muhr G Arens S
Full Access

Introduction: Since the establishment of osteosynthesis as the treatment of choice for bone fractures, the issues relating to complications and their prophylaxis have become a major topic of scientific discussion and research in the field of traumatology. Infection of the bone and soft tissue represents one major complication that arises after the implantation of osteosynthetic material at the fracture site. The treatment of these infections is often time-consuming and involves repeated, extensive surgical interventions. The aim of this study was to acquire information about the effect of an antibacterial and biodegradable poly-L-lactide (PLLA) coated titanium plate osteosynthesis on local infection resistance.

Material and Methods: We compared infection rates in white New Zealand rabbits after titanium plate osteosynthesis of the tibia with or without antibacterial coating after local percutaneous bacterial inoculations at different concentrations (2x105–2xlO8):

group I (n=12):uncoated titanium plate,

group II (n=12): PLLA coated titanium plate,

group III (n=12): titanium plate coated with PLLA + 3% Rifampicin and 7% Fusidic acid, group IV (n= 12): titanium plate coated with PLLA + 2% Octenidin und 8% Irgasan.

The plate, the contaminated soft tissues and the underlying bone were removed under sterile conditions after 28 days and quantitatively evaluated for bacterial growth. A stepwise experimental design with an “up-and-down” dosage technique was used to adjust the bacterial challenge in the area of the ID50 (50% infection dose). Statistical evaluation of the differences between the infection rates of both groups was performed using the two-sided Fisher exact test (p< 0.05).

Results: The overall infection rate was 50%. For group I and II the infection rate was both 83% (10 of 12 animals). In group III and IV with antibacterial coating the infection rate was both 17% (2 of 12 animals). The ID50 in the antibacterial coated groups III and IV was recorded as lxl108 CFU, whereas the ID50 values in the groups I and II without antibacterial coating were a hundred times lower at lxl106 CFU, respectively. The difference between the groups with and without antibacterial coating was statistically significant (p=0.033).

Conclusions: Using an antibacterial biodegradable PLLA coating on titanium plates, a significant reduction of infection rate in a canine infection model could be demonstrated. For the first time we were able to show, under standardized and reproducable conditions, that an antiseptic coating leads to the same reduction in infection rate as an antibiotic coating. Taking the problem of antibiotic-induced bacterial resistance into consideration, we thus regard the antiseptic coating, which shows the same level of effectiveness, as advantageous.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 275 - 275
1 Mar 2004
Schlegel U Aldinger P Mau H Breusch S
Full Access

Aims: Acetabular reinforcement rings have been designed to deal with severe acetabular bone deþciencies in revision arthroplasty of the hip. We report midterm results of 3 different designs. Methods: Between 1986 and 2001, 346 ace-tabular revisions with reinforcement rings were performed at our institution. 20 Burch-Schneider Cages, 135 Ganz and 191 Mueller Rings were implanted. Average Age of the patients at the time of the intervention was 67 years (range 27–93 years). The average follow-up was 4 years (range 1–15 years). Bone defects were classiþed according to the AAOS-Classiþcation. Homologous allografts were used in most cases to reconstruct the acetabulum. Three different techniques were used for allograft preparation: Bone chips, bulk and morselized allografts. Results: Clinical results were moderate in most cases as multiple revisions or other disabling conditions have inßuenced the outcome. Mid-term survival was > 90% at 4 years. An attempt was made to correlate aseptic loosening with allograft preparation methods. Conclusions: Satisfactory results can be achieved at midterm using all three devices. However resorption of allografts leading to migration, dislocation or failure remain a major concern when acetabular reconstruction is used in revision hip arthroplasty.