Chondral defects on the patella are a difficult problem in the young active patient and there is no consensus on how to treat these injuries. Fresh osteochondral allografts are a valid option for the treatment of full-thickness osteochondral defects and can be used to restore joint function and reduce pain. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and subjective outcomes of a series of patients following fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for isolated chondral defects of the patella.

A series of 5 patients underwent surgery using an open approach for graft transplantation. A strict protocol for the allograft tissue was followed. Transplant recipients must be aged <60, have a full-thickness, isolated chondral lesion and have failed previous traditional treatments. The fresh allografts are hypothermically stored at 4°C in X-VIVO10 media for up to 30 days to maintain cartilage viability. Pre- and post-operative clinical measures including knee stability, range of motion, and quadriceps girth were completed. Post-operative plain radiographs were completed including weight-bearing AP, lateral and skyline views. Patient-centred outcome measures including the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Knee Society Score (KSS) were gathered a minimum of 1-year post-operative. Descriptive and demographic data were collected for all patients. A paired t-test was employed to determine the difference between the pre-operative and post-operative outcomes.

All patients were female, with a mean age of 27.4 (SD 3.65). Knee ligament stability was similar pre- and post-operatively. Knee ROM assessment of flexion and extension demonstrated a less than 10° increase from pre to post-operative. Quadriceps girth measurements demonstrated a mean change of 0.5 cm from pre- to post-operative for the surgical limb. Post-operative radiographs demonstrated incorporation of the graft in 4/5 cases within 6-months of surgery. One patient developed fragmentation of the graft after 18-months, and one patient had a subsequent trochleoplasty for persistent pain. The mean KOOS domain scores demonstrated significant improvement (p<0.05) as follows: Symptoms pre-op = 28.57, post-op = 55; Pain pre-op 28.89, post-op = 57.22; ADLs pre-op = 48.92, post-op = 66.18; Sports/Recreation pre-op = 6, post-op = 32; and QoL pre-op = 12.5, post-op = 42.5. Mean pre-op surgical versus non-surgical limb KSS scores were 107.4 and 179 respectively. The mean post-op surgical versus non-surgical limb KSS scores were 166 and 200.

Isolated chondral defects of the patella can cause substantial pain, reduced function, and can be challenging to address surgically. This series of 5 cases demonstrated improved function, KOOS and KSS for 4/5 patients. To our knowledge this is a novel biological procedural technique for this problem, which has shown promising results making it a viable treatment option for young active patients with osteochondral defects of the patella.

The aim of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is to regain functional stability of the knee following ACL injury, ideally allowing patients to return to their pre-injury level of activity. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical, functional and patient-centered outcomes a minimum of 1-year following ACL reconstruction. This study assessed for relationships between post-operative ACL graft laxity, functional testing performance, and scores on the ACL Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) questionnaire.

A prospective cohort study design (n = 1938) was used to gather data on clinical laxity, functional performance and quality of life outcomes. Post-operative ACL laxity assessment using the Lachman and Pivot-shift tests was completed independently on each patient by a physiotherapist and an orthopaedic surgeon at a minimum of 12-months post-operatively. A battery of functional tests was performed including single leg balance, single leg landing, 4 single-leg hop tests, and tuck jumps. The hop tests provided a comparative assessment of limb-to-limb function including a single hop for distance, a 6m timed hop, a triple hop for distance, and a triple crossover hop. Patients com¬pleted the ACL-QOL at the 12-month and 24-month post-operative appointments. Descriptive and demographic data were collected for all patients. The degree and frequency of post-operative laxity was calculated. A Pearson r correlation coefficient was employed to determine the relationship between the presence of post-operative laxity and the ACL-QOL scores, between the battery of functional tests and the ACL-QOL scores, as well as between the functional tests and the laxity assessments.

Data was gathered for 1512/1938 patients (78%). At clinical assessment a minimum of 1-year post-operatively, 13.2% of patients demonstrated a positive Lachman and/or Pivot-shift test. The mean ACL-QOL score for patients with no ACL laxity was 80.8/100, for patients with a positive Lachman or Pivot-shift test the mean score was 72.3/100, and for patients with both positive Lachman and Pivot-shift tests the score was 66.9/100. Pearson r correlation coefficient demonstrated a significant relationship between the presence of ACL graft laxity and ACL-QOL score (p < 0.05). Statistically significant correlations were evident between all of the operative limb single-leg hop tests and the post-operative ACL-QOL scores (p < 0.05). Statistically significant correlations were evident between the operative limb triple-hop tests and presence of ACL graft laxity (p < 0.05).

Patients with clinically measurable ACL graft laxity demonstrate lower ACL-QOL scores as well as lower performance on a battery of functional tests. The disease-specific outcome measure was strongly correlated to the patient's ability to perform single-limb functional tests, indicating that the ACL-QOL score accurately predicted level of function.

The purpose of this study was to validate a dry model for the assessment of performance of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) and labral repair (LR). We hypothesised that the combination of a checklist and a previously validated global rating scale (GRS) would be a valid and reliable means of assessing RCR and LR when performed by residents in a dry model.

An arthroscopic RCR and LR was performed on a dry model by residents, fellows, and sports medicine staff. Any prior RCR and LR exposure was noted. Participants were given a detailed surgical manuscript and technique video before the study began. Evaluation of residents was performed by staff surgeons with task-specific checklists created using a modified Delphi procedure, and the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET). The hand movements and arthroscopic view of the procedures were recorded. Both videos were scored by a fellow blinded to the year of training of each participant.

A total of 35 residents, six fellows and five staff surgeons performed both arthroscopic RCR and LR on a dry model model (48 total). The internal reliability (Cronbach's Alpha) of the test using the total ASSET score was high (>0.8)). One-way analysis of variance for the total ASSET score and the total checklist score demonstrated a difference between participants based upon year of training (p<0.05). Post hoc analysis also demonstrated a significant difference in global ratings and checklist scores between junior residents (PGY1–3) and senior residents (PGY4&5), senior residents and fellows, and fellows and staff. A good correlation was seen between the total ASSET score and prior exposure to RCR and LR. The inter-rater reliability (ICC) between the examiner ratings and the blinded assessor ratings for the total ASSET score was good (0.8).

The results of this study provide evidence that the performance of a RCR and LR in a dry model is a valid and reliable method of assessing a resident's ability to perform these procedures, prior to performance in the operating room.