Fractures repair by two mechanisms; direct fracture healing and indirect fracture healing via callus formation. Research concerning the effects of bisphosphonate on fracture repair has solely assessed indirect fracture healing. Patients with osteoporosis on bisphosphonates continue to sustain fragility fractures. A proportion of osteoporotic fractures require plate fixation. Bisphosphonates impair osteoclast activity and therefore, may adversely affect direct fracture healing that predominates with plate fixation.

Five skeletally mature Sprague-Dawley rats received daily subcutaneous injections of 1mg/kg Ibandronate (IBAN). Similarly, five control rats received saline (CONTROL). Three weeks following commencement of injections a tibial osteotomy was rigidly fixed with compression plating similar to that seen in routine clinical practice. Fracture healing was monitored with radiographs. Six weeks post plate fixation, animals were sacrificed. Radiographs were performed of the extricated tibiae following plate removal. The visibility of the osteotomy site was scored as totally visible, partially visible or absent as previously described. Mechanical testing was conducted on the healing osteotomies via 4-point bending.

Fractures healed without visible external callus. In the IBAN group three animals had totally visible osteotomy lines and two had partially visible osteotomy lines. The CONTROL group had three animals with absent osteotomy lines and two with partially visible osteotomy lines. The mean (±SD) stress at failure for the healing tibial osteotomies at 6 weeks was 28.8 (±23.97)MPa in the IBAN group and 37.4(±29.20) MPa in the CONTROL group (p=0.62)

Our results indicate that Ibandronate adversely affected direct fracture repair as demonstrated by the radiographic density of the fracture line. The strength of the repair was reduced but this did not reach statistical significance. Our results suggest that a sample size of 220 animals is required to detect a 15% difference (alpha 0.05, beta 0.2) which suggests the effect of bisphosphonates on direct fracture repair may be small.

The effect of bisphosphonates on the mechanical properties of the uninjured contra-lateral cortical bone during fracture healing is poorly reported. There remains conflicting evidence with regards the effect of bisphosphonate therapy on cortical bone strength. We assessed the effect of nine weeks of Ibandronate therapy, in a dose known to preserve cancellous bone BMD and strength, on the mechanical properties of the uninjured rat tibial diaphyses using a standardised model of tibial osteotomy and plate fixation. Skeletally mature ex-breeder rats were used. Stress at failure of the tibial diaphyses was measured by a four-point bending test using a custom made jig for rat tibiae. The mechanical strength was compared with radiographic measurements of bone density. Animals received daily subcutaneous injections. 11 rats received 1μg/kg Ibandronate (IBAN) daily and 17 rats received 1ml 0.9% Sodium Chloride (CONTROL) daily.

The IBAN group had a statistically significant, p=0.024, higher stress at failure 212.7 (±42.04) MPa compared to the CONTROL group 171.7 (±46.13)MPa. There was a positive correlation between the mechanical strength of bone and the radiological measure of bone density.

Osteopenia is known to occur following a fracture even in the contra-lateral limb. This study demonstrates that ibandronate therapy has no detrimental effect and may even increase the strength of uninjured cortical bone during the fracture healing process. The longer term effect of ibandronate on cortical bone especially in relation to the accumulation of mico-damage requires further study. Bisphosphonate effect on the uninjured limb needs to be considered when reporting proportional strength of fracture repair compared to the uninjured limb.