Clinical studies have shown that the knee tends to experience laterally higher AP motion (posterior directed) than medially (Asano at al., 2001; Dennis et al., 2005; Hill et al., 2000; Moro Oka et al., 2007). Traditional posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs allow deep flexion stability and femoral rollback once cam/spine engagement occurs, however mechanical stability provided by tibial bearing conformity during early to mid-flexion is highly variable. In this study a computer knee model is used to compare AP kinematics in PS TKA designs while evaluating multiple sagittal tibia bearing conformities. We hypothesized that highly conforming designs would be necessary to promote AP stability prior to cam/spine engagement. A specimen specific computer model consisting of the femur, tibia and fibula, as well as the contribution of the ligaments and capsule was virtually implanted with TKA designs of the appropriate size at 5° tibia slope with the posterior cruciate ligament sacrificed. A single PS femoral component was evaluated with five PS tibia bearing designs with variable sagittal conformity ratios ranging from 1.05:1 to 2.2:1 (conformity ratio = tibia bearing sagittal radius / femur sagittal condylar radius). Designs were fully conforming frontally, with cam/spine engagement beyond 90° flexion. In all designs, lateral conformity ratios were increased relative to medial conformity ratios to facilitate lateral femoral rollback. Resultant AP kinematic predictions were obtained for femoral Low Points (LP) during 1) envelope of motion during internal external (IE) laxity evaluation and 2) knee bend functional activity.INTRODUCTION
METHOD
The intact, healthy human knee joint is stable under anterior-posterior (AP) loading but allows for substantial internal-external (IE) laxity. In vivo clinical studies of the intact knee consistently demonstrate femoral rollback with flexion (Hill et al., 2000, Dennis et al., 2005). A tri-condylar, posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a rotating platform bearing (TKA-A) has been designed to address these characteristics of the intact knee. The third condyle is designed to guide the femoral component throughout the entire flexion arc (AP stability and femoral rollback with flexion), while the rotating platform bearing allows for IE rotation. This study used a computer model to compare the AP and IE laxity of a new TKA-A to that of two clinically established TKAs (TKA-B: rotating PS TKA, TKA-C: fixed PS TKA) and to demonstrate improvements in AP stability, IE rotation, and femoral rollback. A specimen-specific, robotically calibrated computer knee model (Siggelkow et al., 2012), consisting of the femur, tibia and fibula as well as the kinetic contribution of the ligaments and capsule was virtually implanted with appropriate sizes of TKA-A, TKA-B and TKA-C adhering to the respective surgical techniques. A similar extension gap was targeted for all designs. The following kinematic data resulting from applied loads and moments were analyzed: 1) Passive AP and IE laxity (AP load: ± 50 N, IE moment: ± 6 Nm) of the midpoint between the flexion facet centers (Iwaki et al., JBJS, 2000) under low compression (44 N), 2) AP position of the medial and lateral low points (LP) of the femoral component during a lunge motion (Varadarajan et al., 2008).INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Advancements in knee surgery require a profound understanding of knee mechanics. However, there are seemingly contradicting reports regarding certain aspects of normal knee function, such as the location of the pivot of internal-external rotation in the transverse plane. Among others, it has been suggested to be located close to the knee center or in the medial compartment. We hypothesized that this apparent contradiction is a result of different studied knee motions and that it can be explained by the underlying envelopes of motion. The study objective was to characterize normal knee behavior in-vitro with an emphasis on pivot location. Thirty-four cadaveric human knee specimens (Age: 61±8 years, BMI: 25±7) underwent CT and MR imaging and load controlled in-vitro testing using an industrial robot (KUKA, Augsburg, Germany). The robot simulated passive knee flexion and assessed the envelopes of motion through anterior-posterior (AP, ±100 N), medial-lateral (ML, ±100 N) and internal-external (IE, ±6 Nm) laxity testing at five flexion angles. Kinematics were expressed by the femoral flexion facet centers (FFC). The pivot location was determined for IE laxity testing and passive flexion by computing the center of transverse femoral rotation in a least squares sense. Groups were compared by one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results are stated as average ± standard deviation.Introduction
Methods
Smaller increments in the antero-posterior dimensions of femoral components allows significant improvements in balancing of the knee after TKA with restoration of more normal soft-tissue stability. The soft-tissue stability of the knee after TKA is often compromised by the fact that only a finite set of implantable component sizes is available to match bony anatomy. While this could be overcome with custom components, a more practical solution is a set of femoral components with smaller increments in the antero-posterior (AP) dimension. However, this results in a larger assortment of sizes of both implants and trial components. This study was performed to determine whether smaller increments in the AP sizing of knee prostheses would lead to real benefits in restoration of normal knee function and stability after TKA.Summary:
Introduction:
Following total knee arthroplasty, patients often complain of an unnatural feeling in their knee joint, which in turn limits their activities [Noble et al, CORR 2006]. To develop an implant design that recreates the motion of the natural knee, both the functional kinematics as well as the laxity of the joint need to be understood. All testing was performed using a KUKA (KUKA Robotics, Augsburg, Germany) 6 degree of freedom robotic arm and a six degree of freedom load cell (ATI Industrial Automation, Apex, North Carolina, USA), attached to the arm (Figure 1). FUNCTIONAL KINEMATICS: Eight cadaveric specimens implanted with contemporary cruciate retaining implants were used for this evaluation. The functional activity, lunge, was simulated using kinematic control for flexion/extension and force-torque control for the other degrees of freedom. The inputs for the force-torque control were obtained from e-tibia data from live patients during the lunge activity [Varadarajan et al, J Biomech 2008]. At a given flexion angle, the robot moved in force-torque control to obtain the desired values within given tolerances (± 2.5N & ± 0.1 Nm). When these tolerances were met the position of femur with respect to the tibia was recorded and the knee flexed to the next level. The lunge simulation began at full extension and ended at 120 degrees of knee flexion, through 1 degree increments. The kinematic data from the contemporary CR implants were compared to JOINT LAXITY: Eight native, unimplanted knees were used for this evaluation. Joint laxity of the knee joint was evaluated at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 degrees of knee flexion by applying various loads to the tibia and quantifying the resulting motion of the tibia. The resulting laxities were compared to various knee laxity studies in the literature.Introduction:
Methods:
