Background Hip fractures are one of the leading causes of hospital admissions. Surgical treatment is often associated with significant blood loss, requiring post-operative erythrocyte transfusion. Aim To assess post-operative erythrocyte transfusion rates for hip fractures and evaluate the effect of tranexamic acid (TXA). All patients undergoing surgical repair of a hip fracture at RLBUHT between 1st April 2013 – 30th April 2014 were selected. Data regarding transfusion status and peri-operative TXA use was collected from electronic databases and case notes. 450 patients were admitted with a hip fracture, of whom 441 underwent surgery. Modalities of hip fixation included total hip replacement (THR, n=39), hemiarthroplasty (n=145), dynamic hip screw (DHS, n=116), cannulated hip screw (CHS, n=17) and long (n=71) and short (n=53) intramedullary hip screw (IMHS). 44.2% received a post-operative erythrocyte transfusion, with an average of 2.5 units per patient (range 1–9 units). With all study subjects included, the average transfusion rates for THR, hemiarthroplasty, DHS, CHS, long IMHS and short IMHS were 0.44 units, 0.78 units, 0.97 units, 0.47 units, 1.55 units and 1.19 units respectively. Data regarding intra-operative TXA administration was available for 318 (72.1%) patients, sixty-one of whom received TXA. 27.9% given TXA required a post-operative transfusion (range 0–6 units), compared to 35.4% of patient with no intra-operative TXA (range 0–11 units), p=0.142.Method
Results
The undergraduate curricula in the UK have no designated modules on sarcomas. Lumps and bumps are commonly presented to surgeons, hence awareness of sarcoma is important. The aim of this study was to identify the awareness and knowledge of orthopaedic and surgical trainees relating to the presentation, referral and management of sarcomas. Participants were invited to take part and complete an online questionnaire. Sarcoma knowledge was assessed using a variety of questions. Key resources were provided to improve knowledge at the end of the questionnaire. There were 250 respondents, which included medical students (n=49), foundation doctors (n=37), core surgical trainees (n=58), registrars (n=73), post-CCT surgeons (n=9) and academic fellows (n=4). Both UK and international trainees were included. 45% did not recall receiving sarcoma teaching at undergraduate level, with 61% stating they did not have adequate training to identify sarcoma “red flags”. 58% did not have sufficient background knowledge of sarcomas whilst 38% were unable to identify sarcoma red flags. 64% and 25% of trainees had insufficient knowledge of the correct referral process and management for sarcomas respectively. There appears to be a deficiency in training regarding sarcoma identification and management within trainees. “Red flags” for lumps are not widely known who may be asked to review these patients. Many trainees are not aware of the national guidelines for referral and management. The large sample of respondents is likely to be representative of the larger trend and may lead to inappropriate management, poor outcomes and litigation.