Acute septic arthritis of the knee can lead to joint damage or sepsis, if early diagnosis and treatment fail to occur, which includes drainage of the joint, adequate antibiotic coverage and resting of the knee. Classically, drainage of the knee was performed either with multiple aspirations or open arhtrotomy. The arthroscopic approach has becoming widely accepted, as it allows adequate drainage of the pus and debridement with partial or total sinovectomy of the joint.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences between arthroscopy and open arthrotomy in the clinical outcomes and rate of recurrence in patients with septic arthritis of the knee joint.

We reviewed patients with acute septic arthritis of the knee admitted in our center between January 2010 and December 2014. The criteria for diagnosis was report of purulent material when arhtrotomy or arthroscopy was performed or a positive culture of the joint fluid. Patients with recent surgery or documented osteomyelitis of the femur or tíbia were excluded.

We used the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) to classify the clinical outcomes in the end of follow-up, and registered the rate of recurrence in each group. The statistical evaluation of the results was performed using Student's t-test.

65 patients were treated during this period, 37 by an open arthrotomy through a lateral supra-patellar aproach, and 28 by arthroscopy through 2 standard anterior portals. All the patients were imobilized with a cast or orthosis in the immediate post-operation period for a mean period of 13 days in the arthrotomy group (8–15) and 9 days in the arthroscopy group (6–12) and received endovenous antibiotics for at least 10 days, followed by oral antibiotics for a mean total of 36 days in the the arthrotomy group (30–48) and 32 days in the arthroscopy group (22–36). The mean follow-up was 22 months in the arthrotomy group (8–28 months) and 18 months in the arthroscopy group (14–24). The mean OKS was 31 in the the arthrotomy group (21–39) and 35 in the arthroscopy group (25–44). There was 1 recurrence in the arthrotomy group and 1 recurrence in the arthroscopic group, both managed by knee arthrotomy.

Drainage is a key step in treatment of knee pyoarthrosis, either through an open or an arthroscopic approach. Both seem to be equally effective, with no significant statistical difference in terms of recurrence. The functional results tend to favour the arthroscopic approach, but with no statistical significance.

Knee joint infection after an ACL reconstruction procedure is infrequently but might be a devastating clinical problem, if not diagnosed promptly and treated wisely.

The results of functional outcomes in these patients are not well known because there aren't large patient series in the literature.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and determine the adequate management of septic arthritis following ACL reconstruction and to assess the patient functional outcomes.

The authors conducted a retrospective multicentric analysis of septic arthritis cases occurring after arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstructions (hamstrings and BTB), in patients submitted to surgery between 2010 to 2014. The study reviewed patients submitted do ACL reconstruction, that presented objective clinical suspicion of joint infection, in post-operative acute and sub-acute phases, associated with high inflammatory seric parameters (CRP >=10,0, ESR>=30,0) and synovial effusion laboratory parameters highly suggestive (PMN >=80, leucocytes >=3000).

All this patients were treated with antibiotic empiric suppressive therapy and then directed antibiotherapy according to antibiotic sensitivity profile, then the patients were submitted to arthroscopic lavage procedure, without arthropump, but with debris and fibrotic tissue removal preserving always the ACL plasty. The functional outcomes analyzed were the Lysholm and the IKDC score.

Eleven (2.2 %) out of 490 patients analyzed in the sudy were diagnosed with a post-operative septic arthritis. The microbiologic exams showed coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was present in 5 patients (S. lugdunensis in 4 cases and S. capitis in 1 case), Staphylococcus Aureus in 2 patients (1 MSSA and 1 MRSA). In four patients, the micro-organism was not identified.

The studied patients had a mean follow-up of 28 ± 16 months, the Lysholm score was 74.8 ± 12.2, the IKDC score was 66.4 ± 20.5.

Functional outcomes in the control group were better than those obtained in the infected group.

(Lysholm score 88.2 ± 9.4 (NS); IKDC score 86.6 ± 6.8 (NS). All patients retained their reconstructed ACL. None of the patients relapsed or need other intervention because of ACL failure and chronic instability.

The prevalence of septic arthritis after an ACL reconstruction in this series was 2.2 %, slightly higher than other international series (0.14 to 1.7 %). Arthroscopic lavages along with antibiotic treatment showed to be a secure procedure and allowed the preservation of the ACL plasties, without infection relapse. But the functional outcomes after active intra-articular infection were largely inferior to those obtained in patients without infection, probably to uncontrolled and intense inflammatory local response.