Purpose of the study: Arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears is a painful technique. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to analyze prospectively the level of postoperative pain after this procedure and to assess the efficacy of three anti-pain techniques.

Material and method: This prospective randomized study included 140 patients attending two centres specialized in shoulder surgery who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from January to November 2008. Preoperatively, patients were assigned to three anti-pain techniques: interscalenic catheter (KTIS) (n=44 patients), subacromial catheter (KTSA) (n=64 patients), unique subacromial injection of 2% ropivacaine (INJ) (n=32 patients). The procedure was performed under general anaesthesia in all cases. Criteria used to evaluate the efficacy of the anti-pain techniques were: pain as assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) the day before operation to the 30th postoperative day; daily consumption and total dose of opiates; subjective satisfaction with pain management assessed on day 30.

Results: The pain profile was the same as demonstrated last year with a painful displacement on day 1 and progressive decline in pain through day 30 when the pain level was lower than preoperatively. Two risk factors were noted: isolated distal tears of the supraspinatus and concomitant acromioplasty. On day 0, the VAS was ≤ 1.7 in the KTIS group versus 3.6 and 3.5 respectively in the KTSA and INJ groups (p< 0.05). On day 1, the respective values were 3.1, 3.5 and 3.8 (NS). On day 2 and beyond, there was no difference between the three groups. Overall morphine consumption on day 0 was 10.8 mg in the INJ group versus 6.9 and 2.1 mg in the KTSA and KTIS groups, with a significant difference between the INJ and the KTIS groups. There was no difference beyond day 1. Patient satisfaction with pain management during the first 30 postoperative days reached 94.4, 82.9 and 84% respectively for INJ, KTIS and KTSA, with no statistically significant difference between the groups.

Conclusion: The interscalenic catheter technique is more effective than the two other techniques. The subacromial catheter is not better than a single injection of local anaesthetic and is associated with greater risk, suggesting its use should be revisited.

Purpose of the study: Percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) is a new method for minimally invasive fixation of intratrochanteric fractures. Fixation is achieved with two neck screws and a 3-hole plate. This prospective study of a non-randomized series was designed to compare results in a monocentric cohort of patients treated by PCCP or dynamic hip screw (DHS).

Material and methods: From September 2003 to December 2004, all patients presenting an A1 (75.8%) or A1 (24.2%) (AO classification) intratrochanteric fracture were treated with PCCP (n=37) or DHS (n=20). Female gender predominated (86.5%) in this elderly population, mean age 83.2 years. The following variables were studied: operative time, radiation time, blood loss, hemoglobin level, blood transfusion, bone healing, complications, quality of the reduction.

Results: Mean follow-up was 8.3 months. The two groups were similar regarding bone healing, functional outcome and mortality. Intraoperative blood loss was less with PCCP (63 ml) than with DHS (120 ml). Mean fall in hemoglobin level was 2 after PCCP and 3 after DHS. The transfusion rate was 28% for PCCP and 40% for DHS. Mean operative time was 50 for PCCP and 30 minutes for DHS. Men radiation exposure was 4 minutes for PCCP and 1 minute for DHS. The positions of the screw (DHS) and the two PCCP screws were considered good for 68% of the PCCP and 75% of the DHS, acceptable for 29% PCCP and 20% DHS, and poor for 3% PCCP and 5% DHS. Complications were similar (one disassembly in each group).

Discussion: Although this was a preliminary study, PCCP was found to provide an attractive alternative for the treatment of intratrochanteric fractures. Results are similar to those obtained with the DHS but with a less aggressive method (limited approach, less blood loss). A learning curve (at least 10 implantations) appears indispensable to achieve maximum skill. The main drawback is the duration of the radiation. This implant would not be acceptable for subtrochanteric fractures which would require another type of implant.

Purpose of the study: Static metatarsalgia is a common complaint in podology surgery. Most cases are related to the great toe, but in certain cases, isolated metatarsal disharmony, without hallux vlgus, can be observed. We report 45 such cases.

Material and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of isolated metatarsal disharmony observed in patients who underwent metatarsal surgery between 1986 and 2003. There were 36 women and 9 men, mean age 49 years. Three subgroups were distinguished: posttraumatic disharmony, isolated disharmony of the second ray, iatrogenic disharmony. Conditions related to rheumatoid disease, aseptic osteonecrosis of the metatarsal heads, and rear foot disorders were excluded. Surgical treatment was osteotomy of the base of the metatarsal for 24 patients, and Weil’s osteotomy for 21. Clinical and radiological assessment used the Kitaoko and Maestro criteria.

Results: Mean preoperative score was 38 (range 21–58). Mean gain one year after osteotomy was 35 points. The score was 76 after osteotomy of the metatarsal base and 79 after Weil osteotomy. The less favorable results were observed in the group of posttraumatic metatarsalgias. Outcom was less satisfactory in the male population where residual metatarsalgia was noted in 75%. Reflex dystrophy occurred in 15% of the patients who had multiple osteotomies. Radiographically, The SM4 line was centered with progressive geometry in 50%.

Discussion: While the short-term results obtained with these two surgical methods were similar, osteotomy of the metatarsal base offers better long-term outcome. The osteotomy improved the functional score, even without improvement of radiological criteria. Initial treatment of metatarsal fractures should attempt to restore correct alignment of the metatarsals because of the poor results obtained with corrective osteotomy for posttraumatic misalignment.

Conclusion: When metatarsal disharmony is symptomatic, we propose osteotomy of the base of the metatarsals for the median rays in order to avoid transfer metatarsalgia. Complementary osteotomy of the fifth metatarsal is not always necessary.