The aim of this study was to compare accuracy of an image guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (PCNB), using ultrasound or computed tomography, to PCNB without image guidance in the diagnosis of palpable soft tissue tumors. One hundred forty patients with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma underwent a percutaneous core needle biopsy with or without image guidance. One hundred eleven patients had subsequent surgical excision. The accuracy of guided PCNB and blind PCNB was calculated by comparing the histological results of the needle biopsy to the surgical specimen. The diagnostic accuracy of blind percutaneous core needle biopsy was 78% (36 of 46 biopsies) and significantly lower (p ≤ 0.025) in comparison to image guided percutaneous core needle biopsy which was 95% (62 of 65 biopsies). We suggest that image guidance improves the diagnostic accuracy of PCNB especially for small size deep sited suspected soft tissue tumours.
Of the 27 repeat biopsies a positive histological diagnosis was obtained in 22 patients. The remaining 5 were again non-diagnostic giving a total of 98 patients being treated definitively without a tissue diagnosis. Of these 98 cases, 39 (40%) were treated non-operatively, 37 (38%) had curettage and 22 (22%) underwent wide excision. In the curettage group 33 out of 37 patients had a benign tumour on final histology. Four patients turned out to have intermediate/high grade tumours and subsequently underwent wide excision. In the wide excision group, 17 out of 22 patients had an intermediate/high grade tumour on final histology. Five patients underwent an unnecessarily wide excision of a benign lesion. None of the patients treated non-operatively turned out to have a tumour.
To determine the diagnostic performance of image-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients presenting with pathologic fractures of the appendicular skeleton. To determine factors associated with non-diagnostic biopsy and identify cases which should be considered for primary open biopsy. A retrospective audit identified 129 consecutive patients presenting with pathological fractures to a specialist orthopaedic oncology unit over a 9 year period. All patients underwent percutaneous CNB using CT (n=98), fluoroscopy (n=15) or US (n=16) guidance. In all cases MRI or CT was available prior to biopsy to assess the presence and degree of extra-osseous tumour mass. The resulting sample was classified as diagnostic (Group 1) or non-diagnostic (Group 2) on histopathological study. Diagnostic performance was evaluated on the basis of the diagnostic yield and accuracy; these were related to the site of the lesion and presence/absence of extra-osseous mass. Of 129 biopsies, 99 (77%) were classified as Group 1 and 30 (23%) as Group 2. The commonest sites of pathological fracture without associated soft tissue component and resulting in a non-diagnostic biopsy were the proximal femur and proximal humerus. The average cross-sectional diameter of lesions in Group 1 was 5.7 x 5.9cm. Of the 30 lesions comprising Group 2, no soft tissue component was identified on pre-biopsy cross-sectional imaging in 27 lesions (90%) whereas the remaining 3 (10%) showed a smaller extra-osseous soft tissue component compared to the lesions in Group 1. Image-guided percutaneous CNB is a reliable method for obtaining a tissue diagnosis in patients presenting with a pathologic fracture of the appendicular skeleton with high accuracy rate. However, those lesions which are purely intra-osseous or have only very small extra-osseous components are likely to be associated with a non-diagnostic biopsy, and should be considered for a primary open procedure.
Within a study group of 102 consecutive patients diagnosed at a supra-regional bone tumour unit with chondrosarcoma of the femur, tibia or humerus, an association with previously treated breast cancer was noted. There were 58 female patients and 44 male patients. The study group contained six females (10%, mean age 53 years) who had previously been treated for breast cancer, a higher proportion than would be expected. They were referred following identification of a solitary area of increased activity on routine screening with isotope bone scan, presumed to be a solitary bony metastasis. Most (86%) of this breast carcinoma sub-group had developed low-grade bone chondrosarcoma (Trojani grade 0.5-I) and only one case (14%) had developed high-grade chondrosarcoma (Trojani grade II-III). A suspicious long bone lesion on bone scan in a patient with a past medical history of breast cancer must, therefore, not be assumed to be a metastasis without further investigation; the possibility of a chondral lesion should be considered. It is important that patients receive a full multidisciplinary team investigation prior to treatment in order to obtain the correct tissue diagnosis, as the management of these conditions is often different. Our study suggests there may be a relationshipbetween patients previously treated for breast cancer and the development of subsequent chondrosarcoma.
Chondrosarcoma is the second most common primary malignant bone tumour. Distinguishing between grades is not necessarily straightforward and may alter the management of the disease. We evaluated the correlation between the pre-operative needle biopsy and excision biopsy histological grading of chondrosarcoma of the femur, tibia and humerus. A consecutive retrospective series of 100 patients with a histological diagnosis of chondrosarcoma was reviewed. Twenty-one patients were excluded because 20 had only excision biopsy and one had only the pre-operative biopsy on record, thus this series included 79 available cases. In 11 instances, there was a discrepancy in histological grade. Therefore, there was an 86% (68 out of 79) accuracy rate for pre-operative histological grading of chondrosarcoma, based on needle biopsy. However, the accuracy of the diagnostic biopsy to distinguish low-grade from high-grade was 90% (71 out of 79).
The five most common histopathological diagnoses were chondrosarcoma (9%), osteosarcoma (9%), meta-static renal carcinoma (8%), giant-cell tumour (6%), lymphoma (5%). 77% of biopsies yielded a tissue diagnosis. The remaining 23% underwent open biopsy, repeat image-guided needle biopsy or were not further investigated. In the 30 cases (23%) of non-diagnostic biopsies 80% of these lesions had no extra-osseous component to them and the remaining 20% had a very small extra-osseous component.
The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of image guided (ultrasound or CT) percutaneous needle biopsy to percutaneous needle biopsy without image guidance in diagnosis of soft tissue tumours. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with soft tissue lesion who were referred to the soft tissue tumour unit underwent percutaneous needle biopsies of their lesion either with image guidance or without. Sixty-one out of these 88 patients subsequently underwent excision of their lesion and the excised specimen was then subjected to histological examination. The accuracy of image guided percutaneous needle biopsy and percutaneous needle biopsy without image was then calculated by comparing the histological results of the needle biopsy to that of excision biopsy. The diagnosis accuracy of image guided percutaneous needle biopsy was 92% (34 out 37) compared to 79% (22 out of 28) for percutaneous needle biopsy without image. In 3 out of the 28 patients who had percutaneous needle biopsy without image guidance, there was insufficient material obtained from the needle biopsy to allow a histological diagnosis. This was not the case with any of the patients who had image guided percutaneous needle biopsy.
We compared the accuracy of image guided (ultrasound or CT) percutaneous core needle biopsy to percutaneous core needle biopsy without image guidance in diagnosis of soft tissue tumours. 140 patients with soft tissue lesion who were referred to a London bone and soft tissue tumour unit underwent percutaneous core needle biopsies of their lesion either with or without image guidance.111 of these 140 patients subsequently had surgical excision. The accuracy of image guided percutaneous biopsy and percutaneous biopsy without image was then calculated by comparing the histological results of the needle biopsy to that of the resection. The diagnosis accuracy of unguided biopsy was 78% (36 out of 46) compared to 95% (62 out of 65) in image guided. In 6 out of the 46 patients who had unguided biopsy, there was insufficient material obtained from the needle biopsy to allow histological diagnosis. This was not the case with any of the patients who had image guided core needle biopsy. Using image guidance, either USS or CT scan, improves the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous core needle biopsy and must be considered in management of patients with soft tissue tumours.
Aim: To test the null hypothesis that plain X-rays can provide the same assessment of sacral screw placement as CT. Introduction: Engaging the anterior cortex of the sacrum provides additional strength to fixation and is a goal of surgery. The sacrum with its unique anatomy makes it a difficult bone to assess screw placement radiologically. This study examines the positioning of sacral screws as seen on X-rays and compares the result with spiral CT “gold standard”. Materials and methods: Inclusion criteria: Sacral fixation using Diapason (Stryker) Titanium pedicle screws by one surgeon. Spiral CT, plain AP and lateral X-rays of the sacrum. Exclusion criteria: X-rays with more than three level fixation. There were 66 patients (132 S1 screws). Surgical technique engaged the anterior cortex to enhance fixation. Two independent observers (a musculoskeletal radiologist and spinal fellow) who were blinded to outcome, reported findings in forms with constrained fields. Assessment of plain X-ray and CT was at separate times not less than three weeks apart. Variables noted: Screw position in pedicle, screw tip position, and angle of screw (sagittal on axial CT scans). AP X-ray was divided, for each screw, into nine zones based on the first sacral foramina. The position of the screw tip in the zones was noted. The lateral X-ray was divided into three zones to note the tip of the screw in relation to the cortex. The extent of screw protrusion was measured. X-ray technique: Supine AP centred on fusion and lateral X-ray standing, X-ray source 200 cm from the film. CT: Images acquired on Picker PQ 6000 spiral CT with collimated thickness of 3 mm, pitch 1.25 and reconstructive index of 1.Para-sagittal and coronal reconstructions. Spiral CT was used to note the position of the screw within the pedicle and the relation of the screw tip to the anterior cortex. For screws within the pelvis any structure in close proximity was noted. Results: On CT 10% of the screws had breached the pedicle compared with 2% on the plain X-rays. Anterior cortical perforation had been achieved in 48 out of 132 screws on CT. The sensitivity of the plain X-rays to perforation was 40% with a specificity of 92%. There was an average under estimation of the extent of screw perforation by 4.4 mm (95% confidence ±1 mm). There was a correlation between the position of the screw tip on the AP X-ray and the sensitivity of the lateral X-ray to detect a perforation. The sensitivity ranged from 52% for zone 1 to 15% in zone 8. 15/31 perforations were missed in zone 1, compared with 11/13 in zone 8. For screws penetrating 5 mm or more, in zone 8, 9 out of 10 were missed on lateral X-rays. Eighty-five screws were placed at an angle of less than or equal to 25° to the sagittal; this included 28 out of 34 screws placed in zone 8. The inter-observer variance of screw angle measurement was 1.1° and intra-observer difference 1.7°. Overall 95% confidence of a single measurement was ±3.3°. Conclusion: Plain X-rays and CT do not provide the same assessment of sacral screw placement. This is particularly true for sagitally placed screws with screw tips in zones 7–8.